Modern structure of the world market of biotechnology

Abstract

The article focuses on bioeconomics, which, in the context of the development of the information economy, has become a new priority in its direction. The increase in the world population, pollution of the environment, military conflicts, and the world food problem are challenges for the further development of the world community, which can be solved with the help of bioeconomics. The future of the world economy, as well as such areas as health protection, medicine, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, industrial biotechnology, nano biotechnology, bio informatics and others will largely be determined by the level of development of biotechnologies and the newest products created with their help. The authors consider the most typical approaches to the typology of biotechnological industries, which are used, both by national and international technology platforms and enterprises, and by scientists who study biotechnological segments; more attention is paid to the color classification of the profile areas of biotechnology. The article analyzes and systematizes various approaches to the classification of the world market of biotechnologies. The authors investigated the main profile directions of biotechnology development and showed which sectors of the economy are most interested in the development of bioeconomics. The article shows that the developed countries pay the greatest attention to the development of biotechnology. These countries account for the largest share of biotechnology — R&D in the business sector; Sweden and Canada have been the leader in the last few years. Countries are identified and analyzed, which account for the largest share of biotechnology R&D in the business sector and the largest share of expenditures on biotechnology R&D. The US remains the world’s largest supplier and consumer of biotechnology in all areas Further prospects for the development of bioeconomics based on biotechnology are shown. It is proved that biomimicry is the most powerful potential of the future bioeconomics. Proposed steps for the development of bioeconomics in Ukraine.

Authors and Affiliations

Vladyslav Tipanov, Svitlana Tkalenko

Keywords

Related Articles

Econometric models for analysis and prognosis of the enterprise operation

The new formalized models which can be applied for an evaluation of current and prognosis state of enterprise operation are presented in the article. Proposed the innovative econometric method of organization level deter...

Рівень адаптивності стратегічного управління компаніями в цифровій економіці: досвід українських підприємств / Adaptivity level of company strategic management in the digital economy: experience of Ukrainian enterprises

У статті розглянуто теоретичні питання визначення і оцінки адаптивності компаній. Виявлено загальні тенденції впливу цифрової економіки на рівень адаптивності компаній на основі порівняльного аналізу профільних звітів пр...

Target-based public budgeting in Ukraine

The sharp increase in demand for measurement and evaluation of the results of budget expenditures occurred in Ukraine almost half a century later than in the United States. The expansion in demand for productivity, which...

Фінансова складова сталого розвитку корпорації / Financial component of stable innovative development of corporation

У статті обґрунтовано різні погляди на суть і природу сталого розвитку, розмежовано основні компоненти сталого розвитку. Наголошено на можливості застосовувати фінансову складова як у якості передумови, так і у якості ре...

Problems of capitalization of the banking system of Ukraine

Banking capital is a factor that helps to evaluate the perspectives of development of the banking sector in general and a specific bank in particular. Its size determines the scale of bank’s operations. It is necessary t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP353162
  • DOI -
  • Views 151
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Vladyslav Tipanov, Svitlana Tkalenko (2018). Modern structure of the world market of biotechnology. Стратегія економічного розвитку України, 42(), 178-187. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-353162