Nalbuphine and pentazocine in opioid benzodiazepine sedative technique in ear surgery under local anaesthesia –a double blind comparison

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: The use of local anaesthesia and intravenous sedation for middle ear surgeries is long established and has many advantages. Good sedation is mandatory to alleviate different discomforts associated with these surgeries under local anaesthesia. Opioid- benzodiazepine sedation is common technique used for many procedures. Both pentazocine and nalbuphine are nalorphine like opioid agonist antagonist drugs. This study was undertaken with an aim to compare two opioid-benzodiazepine sedative techniques, ‘pentazocine-diazepam’ and ‘nalbuphine-diazepam’ for middle ear surgery under local anaesthesia. Materials and Method: Sixty patients scheduled for elective middle ear surgery between 15 to 50 years age group, of either sex having American society of anaesthesiologists physical status of 1 or 2 were included in the study to receive either pentazocine-diazepam (Group A) or nalbuphine-diazepam (Group B) sedation along with local anesthesia. Results: Ramsay sedation score was satisfactory and comparable in both groups. Respiratory and spo2 changes were safe and comparable in both groups. Intra operative discomforts were minimal and easily manageable in both groups. Analgesic efficacy was good with nalbuphine having statistically significant longer duration of post operative analgesia than pentazocine (p less than 0.00001). Post operative side effects were minimal and comparable in both groups. Conclusion: Both regimens gave satisfactory results in terms of sedation, analgesic efficacy, respiratory and spo2 changes with minimal discomforts and nalbuphine being superior in terms of post operative analgesic duration.

Authors and Affiliations

Sandipbhai Jivanbhai Patel, Rajesh Dyanoba Subhedar

Keywords

Related Articles

Ultrasound versus nerve stimulation technique for interscalene brachial plexus block: A randomized controlled trial

Introduction and Aims: Peripheral nerve block techniques have evolved over time with the advent of peripheral nerve stimulator and ultrasonography. We intend to compare these two techniques in this study with respect to...

Need of pharmacotherapy to prevent hemodynamic effects after subarachnoid block: A prospective randomized double blind placebo controlled study

Introduction and Objective: The neuraxial anesthesia presents several advantages over general anesthesia, however hypotension and bradycardia are the inevitable consequences of spinal anesthesia (SA). In fear of fall in...

A clinical evaluation of the I gel and Air Q as conduits for blind tracheal intubation in adult patients

Introduction: Supraglottic airway devices have been recommended to be used as a conduit for tracheal intubation when required. We hypothesized that both I gel and Air Q would favor blind tracheal intubation with equal su...

Evaluation of safety and efficacy with propofol and etomidate for induction of Anaesthesia in dilatation and curettage

Introduction and Aims We compared the safety efficacy hemodynamic variation recovery duration and adverse effects of propofol and etomidate with or without fentanyl in patients undergoing dilatation and curettage for inc...

Comparative study of gasman software with conventional dial setting for depth of anaesthesia using bis monitor in laparoscopic cholesystectomy

Introduction: Gas Man is a commercial product which allows anaesthesiologist to simulate and experiment with anaesthesia delivery systems. This type of virtual anaesthesia machine is an animated gas machine illustration...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP315082
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2017.0097
  • Views 106
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sandipbhai Jivanbhai Patel, Rajesh Dyanoba Subhedar (2017). Nalbuphine and pentazocine in opioid benzodiazepine sedative technique in ear surgery under local anaesthesia –a double blind comparison. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 4(4), 484-488. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-315082