Nalbuphine and pentazocine in opioid benzodiazepine sedative technique in ear surgery under local anaesthesia –a double blind comparison

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: The use of local anaesthesia and intravenous sedation for middle ear surgeries is long established and has many advantages. Good sedation is mandatory to alleviate different discomforts associated with these surgeries under local anaesthesia. Opioid- benzodiazepine sedation is common technique used for many procedures. Both pentazocine and nalbuphine are nalorphine like opioid agonist antagonist drugs. This study was undertaken with an aim to compare two opioid-benzodiazepine sedative techniques, ‘pentazocine-diazepam’ and ‘nalbuphine-diazepam’ for middle ear surgery under local anaesthesia. Materials and Method: Sixty patients scheduled for elective middle ear surgery between 15 to 50 years age group, of either sex having American society of anaesthesiologists physical status of 1 or 2 were included in the study to receive either pentazocine-diazepam (Group A) or nalbuphine-diazepam (Group B) sedation along with local anesthesia. Results: Ramsay sedation score was satisfactory and comparable in both groups. Respiratory and spo2 changes were safe and comparable in both groups. Intra operative discomforts were minimal and easily manageable in both groups. Analgesic efficacy was good with nalbuphine having statistically significant longer duration of post operative analgesia than pentazocine (p less than 0.00001). Post operative side effects were minimal and comparable in both groups. Conclusion: Both regimens gave satisfactory results in terms of sedation, analgesic efficacy, respiratory and spo2 changes with minimal discomforts and nalbuphine being superior in terms of post operative analgesic duration.

Authors and Affiliations

Sandipbhai Jivanbhai Patel, Rajesh Dyanoba Subhedar

Keywords

Related Articles

Etomidate versus Propofol as induction agent in patients undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticogram (ERCP)

Background: Endoscopic retrograde pancreaticogram (ERCP) requires patient to be sedated and pain free in prone position. Propofol sedation may cause cardiorespiratory depression. Etomidate is a good alternative with stab...

Comparison of intrathecal levobupivacaine and levobupivacaine with fentanyl in caesarean section - a randomised trial

Introduction: Levobupivacaine is less cardio toxic and has a longer duration of analgesia compared to bupivacaine. There are limited studies comparing the effects of addition of fentanyl with levobupivacaine. To compare...

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine as intrathecal adjuvant in subarachnoid block and postoperative analgesia

Introduction: Various adjuvants have been used intrathecally to improve the quality and duration of the spinal anaesthesia along with better postoperative analgesia We studied the effect of dexmedetomidine as intrathecal...

Efficacy of orally disintegrating film vs intravenous ondansetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in middle ear surgeries under general anaesthesia

Introduction Ondansetron is widely used perioperative antiemetic In this study we have assessed the antiemetic efficacy of orally disintegrating film ODF in middle ear surgeries associated with higher incidence of PONVMa...

A study of the effect of caudal epidural neostigmine for post operative pain relief in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery

Introduction and Objective: Providing adequate pain relief has always been part of anaesthesiologist’s role in the perioperative period beyond post anaesthesia care unit. Among the many adjuvants studied neostigmine was...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP315082
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2017.0097
  • Views 119
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sandipbhai Jivanbhai Patel, Rajesh Dyanoba Subhedar (2017). Nalbuphine and pentazocine in opioid benzodiazepine sedative technique in ear surgery under local anaesthesia –a double blind comparison. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 4(4), 484-488. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-315082