INCOME INEQUALITY: MAJOR TRENDS AND FORMS

Abstract

This article investigates income inequality among the population of transition economy countries. Studying different theoretical views on the problem of inequality and its relation to economic efficiency, it should be mentioned that there is no definite answer to the question of their interrelation. The pioneering research on interrelation between economic growth and income inequality was done by the outstanding economist S. Kuznets who established statistical correlation of the abovementioned categories based on the data from various countries at different stages of development. Modern theories describing interrelation between income inequality and economic growth utilize a number of factors (loan market imperfection, difference in savings rates, staff encouragement, etc.) to explain positive or negative impact of inequality on economic efficiency. One of the answers to the question of how inequality affects economic efficiency is its subdivision into productive and nonproductive (excessive). Productive inequality is unequal distribution of economic resources and cash flows among the population that is characterized by economic factors driven by objective market mechanisms. The impact of productive inequality on the efficiency of economic development is positive, stimulating productive competition and economic activity of the population and creating conditions for development and upgrading of skills and abilities. Nonproductive inequality is unequal distribution of monetary and material goods among the population driven by such factors as bureaucracy, illegal privatization and looting of national wealth. Nonproductive inequality hampers economic development, aggravating polarization and stratification, discouraging the population from effective professional activity and causing depressive sentiment that may bring people to the cycle of poverty. Based on the above, it is important to decrease the level of nonproductive inequality, which preconditions state intervention aiming to compensate for shortcomings of the market system, decreasing social and economic inequality. Ensuring the right of every person for certain standards and minimum guarantees and controlling income by its redistribution are the main functions of the state as a subject of social and market economy.  

Authors and Affiliations

S. Tyutyunnikova, O. Kulish

Keywords

Related Articles

THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CORPORATE ORGANIZATIONAL LEGAL FORMS IN UKRAINE AND EU

Given impact of European integration processes and the growing interest of the state to en- hance the corporate sector of Ukraine is topical question in the study of the current state of the corporate sector. This articl...

ФОРМУВАННЯ ОПТИМАЛЬНОГО ПІДХОДУ ЩОДО УПРАВЛІННЯ КАДРАМИ ЗАЛЕЖНО ВІД ЗМІН НА ТОРГОВЕЛЬНОМУ ПІДПРИЄМСТВІ 

Людські ресурси являють собою основу будь-якої організації, тому цей елемент потребує значної уваги. В даній статті автор пропонує певний оптимальний підхід щодо управління кадрами відповідно до кожної стадії життєвого ц...

 IMPACT OF THE CRISIS ON THE ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT

In the modern business environment characterized by unstable economic and political situation in Ukraine enterprises increasingly difficult to conduct effective management. Unfavorable state of the environment affected t...

 NATIONAL ECONOMIC EDUCATION AT THE END OF THE 19TH CENTURY AND ITS AXIOLOGICAL POTENTIAL

The article covers the urgent need which the domestic industry faced at the end of the 19th century, which was coming from the industry modernization, in particular, the need for educated personnel. This need actualized...

АНАЛІЗ ВПЛИВУ ДЕРЖАВИ НА ПІДВИЩЕННЯ РІВНЯ МІЖНАРОДНОЇ КОНКУРЕНТОСПРОМОЖНОСТІ РЕГІОНІВ

Предметом роботи є теоретичні основи впливу держави на підвищення конкурентос- проможності її регіонів на міжнародному рівні. Метою роботи є розробка методики аналізу впливу дер- жави на міжнародну конкурентоспроможність...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP105171
  • DOI -
  • Views 168
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

S. Tyutyunnikova, O. Kulish (2014).  INCOME INEQUALITY: MAJOR TRENDS AND FORMS. Проблеми і перспективи розвитку підприємництва, 1(6), 81-85. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-105171