Niekonstytucyjność art. 8 ustawy o radcach prawnych
Journal Title: Radca Prawny. Zeszyty naukowe - Year 2019, Vol 18, Issue 1
Abstract
The provision of Article 8 of the Public Procurement Law Act is not in compliance with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland in terms of the scope, in which it provides for the majority of restrictions on the freedom of choice of organizational and legal forms of exercising the profession of an attorney-at-law and should be amended immediately. Continuing to maintain restrictions that violate constitutional guarantees of rights and freedoms not only interfere with the rule of law, but also negatively affect the functioning and development of the legal market in Poland.
Authors and Affiliations
Bogusław Sołtys
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP593339
- DOI -
- Views 150
- Downloads 0
Upadłość osoby fizycznej nieprowadzącej działalności gospodarczej oraz prowadzącej działalność gospodarczą w ujęciu komparatystycznym
This study presents a concise and practical summary of bankruptcy proceedings for consumers and entrepreneurs who are natural persons. The article addresses and compares key issues connected with conducting such proceedi...
Glosa do wyroków Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 4 lipca 2012 r. (II GSK 917/11), z dnia 19 grudnia 2012 r. (II GSK 1823/11), z dnia 6 lutego 2013 r. (II GSK 2171/11)
The gloss refers to three judgments of the Supreme Administrative Court – of 4 July 2012 (court file No. II GSK 917/11), of 19 December 2012 (court file No. II GSK 1823/11), and of 6 February 2013 (court file No. II GSK...
Legitymacja czynna Przewodniczącego Komisji Nadzoru Finansowego w postępowaniu przed Sądem Najwyższym
The article concerns the powers granted to the Chair of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (hereinafter “Chair of the PFSA”) in proceedings before the Supreme Court pursuant to Articles 83 and 89 of the Act of De...
Granice sprostowania orzeczenia w postępowaniu cywilnym, skutki ich przekroczenia, próba nowego spojrzenia
The article is based on the assumption that judgment rectification is a necessity in the course of every court’s operations – not excluding the Supreme Court, the ECHR, and the CJEU – because errors and mistakes may appe...
Glosa krytyczna do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 25 stycznia 2017 r. (sygn. akt IV CSK 205/16)
While trying cessation appeals, the Supreme Court may not call into question the facts established by the lower courts or the assessment of the evidence. In addition, a final judgement issued in so-called partial proceed...