ПРОБЛЕМА ЗНАННЯ Й ОСВІТИ У ФІЛОСОФІЇ М. ШЕЛЕРА

Abstract

Pochynok I. The Problem of Knowledge and Education in Philosophy of M.Sheller. It is show in the article that specificity of investigation of knowledge and education by Sheller is stipulated first and foremost by its metaphysical-ontological and philosophical-anthropological ideas. The philosopher considers knowledge and education as attributes of self-determination and self-improvement of the man in the world that is as principally rooted in his being. Knowledge and education according to Sheller are the manifestation of eternal dualism and counteraction of cosmic grounds – the element of vital energy and creativity, being powerless to the spirit, which in a human being reach their apogee. Theoretical comprehension and sequence of these opposed processes are realized by the philosopher on the basis of mutually complementary sociological and phenomenological methods. The sociological approach enables the scientist to show real determination of knowledge and education, their genesis and actuality in various epochs, cultural regions, as well as their pragmatically functional meaning. Phenomenological procedures enable the understanding of the essence of knowledge and education as the Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету. Серія: 106 Філософія. Випуск 779 phenomena of the life experience of the man, their authenticities, but in the main – the significance of forming the man as a personality. Sheller proves that the existing types of knowledge – science, philosophy, religion – are principally rooted in the human essence, but they are differently manifested in history and various regions of culture owing to different correlation. He especially differentiates those criteria of the corresponding types of knowledge, which characterize their specificity: such criteria as substantiated, analytical, operational, verificated are inherent to scientific knowledge. Educational knowledge is characterized by the essence definition, paradigmality, humanistic mission; intention on the deity, personality, independence from vital instincts, orientation on highest human aims and purports of life inherent to religious knowledge. Sheller´s analysis of knowledge and education contains a substantial Weltanschauung and methodological potential for reforming the educational process.

Authors and Affiliations

Ірина Починок

Keywords

Related Articles

INTERTEXTUAL FEATURES IN THE POETRY BY VOLODYMYR LUCHUK AS AN EXPRESSION OF INTERLITERARY COMMUNICATION

The author analyzes the peculiarities of intertextual connections in the poetry by Volodymyr Luchuk. For every writer, the phenomenon of intertextuality is presented in a rather peculiar way: to a greater or lesser exten...

ЕКЗИСТЕНЦІЙНІ ВИМІРИ ТУРИЗМУ

Daneliuk A. Melnychuk M. The Existential Dimensions of Tourism. The article is dedicated to the analysis of tourism concept in the modern philosophical discourse. Philosophy of tourism is defined as a particular branch o...

ПОНЯТТЄВЕ СПРОЩЕННЯ ТА ФІЛОСОФСЬКИЙ СМИСЛ

Атомарне уявлення про утворення смислу речення як функцію простих елементів, представлених окремими логічними поняттями у вигляді самостійних слів, утворює метафізичну передумову аналітичної філософії та основний методол...

MARÍA ZAMBRANO: MUJER Y FILOSOFÍA

The article dwells upon investigation on introducing a female universum into the philosophical field. Human reception is regarded as an ability of hearing, the latter being reflected through numerous possibilities of lif...

РАЦІОНАЛЬНА РЕКОНСТРУКЦІЯ ЯК МЕТОД ПРИКЛАДНОЇ СИТУАЦІЙНОЇ ЛОГІКИ

Rational reconstruction as the method of historical and philosophical cognition is in the center of historical and philosophical discussion. Firstly, I. Lacatos paid attention to it, then, especially in the sphere of his...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP298648
  • DOI -
  • Views 109
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ірина Починок (2016). ПРОБЛЕМА ЗНАННЯ Й ОСВІТИ У ФІЛОСОФІЇ М. ШЕЛЕРА. Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича. Серія: філософія, 1(779), 100-106. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-298648