РАЦІОНАЛЬНА РЕКОНСТРУКЦІЯ ЯК МЕТОД ПРИКЛАДНОЇ СИТУАЦІЙНОЇ ЛОГІКИ
Journal Title: Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича. Серія: філософія - Year 2016, Vol 1, Issue 779
Abstract
Rational reconstruction as the method of historical and philosophical cognition is in the center of historical and philosophical discussion. Firstly, I. Lacatos paid attention to it, then, especially in the sphere of historical and philosophical researching, it was examined Z. Kamensky and S. Rudenko. However, as the method of applied situational logic, rational reconstruction has not researched. This article has the aim to fill a gap and show the intercommunication between the concept of situational logic by K. Popper and the method of rational reconstruction I. Lacatos, Z. Kamensky and S. Rudenko. His positional logic, K. Popper did not tell in the form of the whole concept. It is introduced by the chain of separate fragments. Consequently necessity its whole reconstruction. So, to understand I. Lacatos’s method of rational reconstruction, should realize rational reconstruction of K. Poppers’s situational logic. So, one explanation will help to realize another explanation. Situational logic or K. Popper’s logic of situations is rational reconstruction and interpretation of local situation. It divided on theoretical and applied situational logic. S. Rudenko’s method of rational reconstruction in modern methodological concept of researching the history of philosophy is added by method of reconstructional reflection. S. Rudenko has proposed reconstructive reflection to realize as the method, witch on the foundation of analysis of ontological, gnoseological and cognitive foundations coordinate conflicting rational reconstructions the history of native philosophy. The function of theoretical situational logic carries out the methodological reflection and interpretation of situation, the function of applied situational logic – its interpretations of Darwinism and Marxism. I. Lacatos’s method of rational reconstruction the history of science in Z. Kamensky’s imperatively-directional researching and S. Rudenko’s modern methodological concepts non-descriptive historical and philosophical Ukrainian Studies had status of methodological instrument by cultural predication historical and philosophical reflection.
Authors and Affiliations
Ярослав Гнатюк
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP297792
- DOI -
- Views 148
- Downloads 0
КОНСТРУКТИВІСТСЬКЕ БАЧЕННЯ ДЕІДЕОЛОГІЗАЦІЇ ПІЗНАННЯ
This article is a rough draft to the project of deideologisation of knowledge made in constructivist techniq ue. Despite of numerous project-like speculations around revision of epistemology and its relation to the proce...
ВИКЛИКИ ГЛОБАЛІЗАЦІЇ ТА КУЛЬТУРНА ІДЕНТИЧНІСТЬ
spiritual and cultural life of a society. The reason for this is correlated to a public need to ensure national integration in the conditions of global transformations of the world. There is also a need for understanding...
ЕКЗИСТЕНЦІЙНІ ВИМІРИ ТУРИЗМУ
Daneliuk A. Melnychuk M. The Existential Dimensions of Tourism. The article is dedicated to the analysis of tourism concept in the modern philosophical discourse. Philosophy of tourism is defined as a particular branch o...
MARÍA ZAMBRANO: MUJER Y FILOSOFÍA
The article dwells upon investigation on introducing a female universum into the philosophical field. Human reception is regarded as an ability of hearing, the latter being reflected through numerous possibilities of lif...
СОЦІАЛЬНА ЕПІСТЕМОЛОГІЯ (НОРМАТИВНИЙ ТА НАТУРАЛІСТСЬКИЙ ПІДХОДИ)
Malishena Y. Social Epistemology (Normative and Naturalistic Approaches). Researcher studies the peculiarities of modern interdisciplinary branch in philosophical research, namely social epistemology. The problematic of...