ПРОБЛЕМИ ВИЗНАЧЕННЯ РОДОВОГО ОБ’ЄКТА ДЛЯ ЗЛОЧИНУ, ПЕРЕДБАЧЕНОГО СТАТТЕЮ 112 КРИМІНАЛЬНОГО КОДЕКСУ УКРАЇНИ

Abstract

The article analyzes the problems of determining the generic object for a crime under Article 112 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The conclusion is made about the need to improve this definition in connection with the adoption of the new Law of Ukraine “On National Security”. This requires a new scientific interpretation of this legal structure for section I of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine as a whole, and for certain crimes of this section, in particular, encroachment on the life of a state or public figure. The complexity of the phenomenon under study and the limitations of research methods, according to scientists, can provoke a simplified approach to clarifying the content of the concept of national security and give rise to false conclusions of the analysis of the legislative definition. The components of the national security structure on a functional basis have their own specifics. Due to the influence of various factors, depending on the specific historical circumstances, one or another component may take priority. It means that, without denying, in general, the definitions proposed by legal scholars, we believe that taking into account the provisions of the new Law of Ukraine “On National Security of Ukraine” and our own position, it is possible to use this definition of the generic object of crimes provided for in Section I of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine “Crimes against the foundations of national security Of Ukraine”, namely, the generic object of these crimes is the system of social relations ensuring the protection of the vital interests of a person, society and States countries, the implementation of which guarantees the sovereignty of Ukraine and its progressive democratic development, as well as safe conditions of life and well-being of its citizens from the real and potential threats to military or non-military, which can make it impossible or hinder the realization of national interests of Ukraine and the preservation of national values.

Authors and Affiliations

О. О. Кияшко

Keywords

Related Articles

ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ГРОМАДСЬКОГО ПОРЯДКУ ОРГАНАМИ МІСЦЕВОГО САМОВРЯДУВАННЯ В ЄС: ВИВЧЕННЯ ПОЗИТИВНОГО ДОСВІДУ

The article notes that one of the main tasks of reforming local self-government and the territorial organization of power in Ukraine is the creation of safe conditions for the life of people and society. The example of P...

ПРАВОВЕ РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ АНТИДЕМПІНГОВОГО МИТА В УКРАЇНІ

The antidumping duty is a type of customs duty applicable in Ukraine. The general features of antidumping duty are: the tax nature, the obligation and the conditionality of payment by the fact of moving goods across the...

РОЗРОБЛЕННЯ ПОНЯТТЯ «ІНФОРМАЦІЙНА БЕЗПЕКА» У ПРАВОВОМУ НАПРЯМІ: ТЕОРЕТИЧНИЙ АНАЛІЗ

The article presents a brief overview of scientific legal literature, primarily the Ukrainian one, which analyzes information security as a political and legal phenomenon that takes in not only the notion of information...

ПОНЯТТЯ ПУБЛІЧНОЇ БЕЗПЕКИ І ПОРЯДКУ ЯК ОБ’ЄКТА ВЗАЄМОДІЇ ТЕРИТОРІАЛЬНИХ ПІДРОЗДІЛІВ НАЦІОНАЛЬНОЇ ПОЛІЦІЇ З ОРГАНАМИ МІСЦЕВОГО САМОВРЯДУВАННЯ

The article examines the emergence in the legislative circulation of the new term “public security and order”, its actual concept as an object of interaction of territorial units of the National Police with local self-go...

СЛІДЧИЙ – СУБ’ЄКТ РЕАЛІЗАЦІЇ ЗВІЛЬНЕННЯ ВІД КРИМІНАЛЬНОЇ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНОСТІ: НАПРЯМИ УДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ КРИМІНАЛЬНО-ПРОЦЕСУАЛЬНОГО ЗАКОНОДАВСТВА

The content rights and duties of the subject of criminal procedural relations, the investigator, concerning the release from criminal liability there investigated. The necessity, based on the analysis of the current and...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP607982
  • DOI -
  • Views 45
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

О. О. Кияшко (2018). ПРОБЛЕМИ ВИЗНАЧЕННЯ РОДОВОГО ОБ’ЄКТА ДЛЯ ЗЛОЧИНУ, ПЕРЕДБАЧЕНОГО СТАТТЕЮ 112 КРИМІНАЛЬНОГО КОДЕКСУ УКРАЇНИ. Південноукраїнський правничий часопис, 4(1), 46-48. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-607982