ПРОБЛЕМИ ВИЗНАЧЕННЯ РОДОВОГО ОБ’ЄКТА ДЛЯ ЗЛОЧИНУ, ПЕРЕДБАЧЕНОГО СТАТТЕЮ 112 КРИМІНАЛЬНОГО КОДЕКСУ УКРАЇНИ

Abstract

The article analyzes the problems of determining the generic object for a crime under Article 112 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The conclusion is made about the need to improve this definition in connection with the adoption of the new Law of Ukraine “On National Security”. This requires a new scientific interpretation of this legal structure for section I of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine as a whole, and for certain crimes of this section, in particular, encroachment on the life of a state or public figure. The complexity of the phenomenon under study and the limitations of research methods, according to scientists, can provoke a simplified approach to clarifying the content of the concept of national security and give rise to false conclusions of the analysis of the legislative definition. The components of the national security structure on a functional basis have their own specifics. Due to the influence of various factors, depending on the specific historical circumstances, one or another component may take priority. It means that, without denying, in general, the definitions proposed by legal scholars, we believe that taking into account the provisions of the new Law of Ukraine “On National Security of Ukraine” and our own position, it is possible to use this definition of the generic object of crimes provided for in Section I of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine “Crimes against the foundations of national security Of Ukraine”, namely, the generic object of these crimes is the system of social relations ensuring the protection of the vital interests of a person, society and States countries, the implementation of which guarantees the sovereignty of Ukraine and its progressive democratic development, as well as safe conditions of life and well-being of its citizens from the real and potential threats to military or non-military, which can make it impossible or hinder the realization of national interests of Ukraine and the preservation of national values.

Authors and Affiliations

О. О. Кияшко

Keywords

Related Articles

ЗНАЧЕННЯ ПСИХОЛОГІЧНИХ ОЗНАК ОСОБИ ЗЛОЧИНЦЯ: КРИМІНОЛОГІЧНИЙ АНАЛІЗ

The article defines the main features of the person of the offender. The significance of the psychological features of a person of a criminal for criminal-legal qualification of crimes is analyzed. Groups of crimes are c...

РОЗВИТОК ТЕОРІЇ ПРАВОВОГО СТИМУЛЮВАННЯ У НАУЦІ ТРУДОВОГО ПРАВА

The article explores the development of the theory of legal stimulation in the science of labor law. The controversial aspects of the emergence of a legal institution of stimulation in the system of labor law are analyze...

ДОСВІД ПІДГОТОВКИ ПОЛІЦЕЙСЬКИХ КАДРІВ У ЗАРУБІЖНИХ КРАЇНАХ

The article deals with the experience of selection and training of police staff in foreign countries. The analysis of the current state of reform of the National Police of Ukraine was carried out. The peculiarities of se...

«ДЕРАДЯНІЗАЦІЯ» КРИМІНАЛЬНОГО ЗАКОНУ УКРАЇНИ: АСПЕКТИ РЕФОРМУВАННЯ

The scientific article examines the issues of reforming criminal law in order to deprive aspects of the Soviet commons as a mechanism for the European integration processes that occur in Ukraine, including the issues of...

ГЕНЕЗА НАУКОВИХ ДОСЛІДЖЕНЬ У ПИТАННІ ВИЗНАЧЕННЯ ПРАВООХОРОННОЇ ФУНКЦІЇ ДЕРЖАВИ

The article is devoted to the theoretical study of the origin and formation of the law-enforcement function of the state, its content,taskandobject. Theauthor,onthebasisofthestudyofthe views of lawyers on the understandi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP607982
  • DOI -
  • Views 62
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

О. О. Кияшко (2018). ПРОБЛЕМИ ВИЗНАЧЕННЯ РОДОВОГО ОБ’ЄКТА ДЛЯ ЗЛОЧИНУ, ПЕРЕДБАЧЕНОГО СТАТТЕЮ 112 КРИМІНАЛЬНОГО КОДЕКСУ УКРАЇНИ. Південноукраїнський правничий часопис, 4(1), 46-48. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-607982