Proof construction and evaluation practices of prospective mathematics educators

Journal Title: European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education - Year 2015, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

This study was conducted with 93 freshmen and 82 senior prospective mathematicians and mathematics teachers in order to investigate how they construct and evaluate proofs and whether there are any significant differences in their proof construction (with respect to department and grade) and proof evaluation (with respect to department) performances. Instruments developed for this purpose are Proof Exam (PE) and Proof Evaluation Exam (PEE). While no significant differences were observed among freshmen with respect to department in PE scores; senior students’ mean scores differ significantly both in PE and PEE. It has been observed that freshmen students mostly rely on inductive reasoning when they attempt to prove given mathematical statements. Even though seniors are mostly aware of the necessity of generalizing their results and attempting to use procedures involving deductive reasoning, they still have difficulties in constructing and evaluating proofs. Implications for teaching are discussed.

Authors and Affiliations

Yeşim İmamoğlu *| Department of Primary Education, Maltepe University, Istanbul, Turkey, For correspondence: yesim.imamoglu@gmail.com, Ayşenur Yontar Toğrol| Department of Secondary School Science and Mathematics Education, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative effects of concept mapping and cooperative learning strategies on senior secondary school students’ achievement in mathematics-trigonometry in Kano State, Nigeria

This article presents the findings from an experimental study on the effectiveness of concept mapping and cooperative learning strategies on SSII students’ achievement in trigonometry in mathematics. The research design...

Why do chemistry students need to take mathematics courses?

Students tend to ask why they should learn mathematics lessons or courses. This study investigates the perceptions of chemistry students and their instructors about the relevance of mathematics courses to their field of...

What’s natural about nature? deceptive concepts in socio-scientific decision-making

The conflicts between nature and nurture are brought to the fore and challenges socio-scientific decision-making in science education. The multitude of meanings of these concepts and their roles in societal discourses ca...

The mistakes and the misconceptions of the eighth grade students on the subject of angles

The purpose of this study was to determine the learning levels, mistakes, and misconceptions of the 8th grade students on the subject of “angles in geometry” as well as the possible reasons for these situations. Research...

An alternative triangle area strategy

We explore the mathematics engagement of a group ofmathematics coaches, working in k-12 mathematics education. The incenter of a triangle is used to derive an alternative formula for the area of a triangle inspired by Us...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP8060
  • DOI -
  • Views 419
  • Downloads 37

How To Cite

Yeşim İmamoğlu *, Ayşenur Yontar Toğrol (2015). Proof construction and evaluation practices of prospective mathematics educators. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 130-144. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-8060