Proof construction and evaluation practices of prospective mathematics educators

Journal Title: European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education - Year 2015, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

This study was conducted with 93 freshmen and 82 senior prospective mathematicians and mathematics teachers in order to investigate how they construct and evaluate proofs and whether there are any significant differences in their proof construction (with respect to department and grade) and proof evaluation (with respect to department) performances. Instruments developed for this purpose are Proof Exam (PE) and Proof Evaluation Exam (PEE). While no significant differences were observed among freshmen with respect to department in PE scores; senior students’ mean scores differ significantly both in PE and PEE. It has been observed that freshmen students mostly rely on inductive reasoning when they attempt to prove given mathematical statements. Even though seniors are mostly aware of the necessity of generalizing their results and attempting to use procedures involving deductive reasoning, they still have difficulties in constructing and evaluating proofs. Implications for teaching are discussed.

Authors and Affiliations

Yeşim İmamoğlu *| Department of Primary Education, Maltepe University, Istanbul, Turkey, For correspondence: yesim.imamoglu@gmail.com, Ayşenur Yontar Toğrol| Department of Secondary School Science and Mathematics Education, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey

Keywords

Related Articles

How does grit impact college students’ academic achievement in science?

Research has suggested that achievement is not solely based on the cognitive abilities of the learner, but rather on the combination of cognitive ability and personality traits. This paper explores how grit affects stude...

Why do chemistry students need to take mathematics courses?

Students tend to ask why they should learn mathematics lessons or courses. This study investigates the perceptions of chemistry students and their instructors about the relevance of mathematics courses to their field of...

Primary school teachers’ interviews regarding Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) and General Pedagogical Knowledge (GPK)

Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) and General Pedagogical Knowledge (GPK) are fundamental types of knowledge for a teacher that he or she must use in order to plan, teach in the classroom, and assess students’ learnin...

Scientific skateboarding and mathematical music: edutainment that actively engages middle school students

Edutainment has recently been a major growing area of education, showing great promise to motivate students with relevant activities. The authors are among innovators who have developed cutting-edge fusions of popular c...

Impact of using history of mathematics on students’ mathematics attitude: a meta-analysis study

The main objective of hereby study is to unearth the big picture, reaching studies about influence of using history of mathematics on attitude of mathematics among students. 6 studies with a total effect size of 14 that...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP8060
  • DOI -
  • Views 344
  • Downloads 37

How To Cite

Yeşim İmamoğlu *, Ayşenur Yontar Toğrol (2015). Proof construction and evaluation practices of prospective mathematics educators. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 130-144. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-8060