Proof construction and evaluation practices of prospective mathematics educators
Journal Title: European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education - Year 2015, Vol 3, Issue 2
Abstract
This study was conducted with 93 freshmen and 82 senior prospective mathematicians and mathematics teachers in order to investigate how they construct and evaluate proofs and whether there are any significant differences in their proof construction (with respect to department and grade) and proof evaluation (with respect to department) performances. Instruments developed for this purpose are Proof Exam (PE) and Proof Evaluation Exam (PEE). While no significant differences were observed among freshmen with respect to department in PE scores; senior students’ mean scores differ significantly both in PE and PEE. It has been observed that freshmen students mostly rely on inductive reasoning when they attempt to prove given mathematical statements. Even though seniors are mostly aware of the necessity of generalizing their results and attempting to use procedures involving deductive reasoning, they still have difficulties in constructing and evaluating proofs. Implications for teaching are discussed.
Authors and Affiliations
Yeşim İmamoğlu *| Department of Primary Education, Maltepe University, Istanbul, Turkey, For correspondence: yesim.imamoglu@gmail.com, Ayşenur Yontar Toğrol| Department of Secondary School Science and Mathematics Education, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP8060
- DOI -
- Views 451
- Downloads 37
Astronauts in outer space teaching students science: comparing Chinese and American implementations of space-to-earth virtual classrooms
The purpose of this study was to investigate differences between science lessons taught by Chinese astronauts in a space shuttle and those taught by American astronauts in a space shuttle, both of whom conducted experime...
The impact of guided student-generated questioning on chemistry achievement and self-efficacy of elementary preservice teachers
This study investigated the use of Guided Student-Generated Questioning (GSGQ) as a metacognitive instructional strategy to increase chemistry achievement and self-efficacy of elementary preservice teachers. The Chemistr...
‘Engaging in an argumentative discourse’- narratives from biology classrooms
The present paper delves into the classroom dynamics of Biology classrooms taking into account teaching learning processes associated with some of the ethical issues in Biological Sciences. Argumentation and debate appe...
Inquiry based learning and meaning generation through modelling on geometrical optics in a constructionist environment
The central roles that modelling plays in the processes of scientific enquiry and that models play as the outcomes of that enquiry are well established (Gilbert & Boulter, 1998). Besides, there are considerable similarit...
Effect of polya problem-solving model on senior secondary school students’ performance in current electricity
This study was designed to investigate the Effect of Polya Problem-Solving Model on Senior School Students’ Performance in Current Electricity. It was a quasi experimental study of non- randomized, non equivalent pre-tes...