Proportionality principle in the eu intellectual property law
Journal Title: Наукові записки НаУКМА. Юридичні науки - Year 2018, Vol 0, Issue
Abstract
As a result of a country’s accession to the EU, primary and secondary EU law becomes a part of the national law, which still maintains a certain autonomy. EU authorities also promote the correctness and unambiguity of the application of EU law within national jurisdictions. This is manifested primarily in the functions of the ECJ, which can provide a detailed interpretation of appeals from national courts in cases where there are doubts about the interpretation of certain legal norms of the EU. Marleasing, a methodological principle of ECJ interpretation (a term introduced by J. Pila), has been considered and supported by the principle of proportionality and national intellectual property regimes. The central element of the principle of proportionality on the basis of methodology is the doctrine of indirect effect, i.e. the directives can be applied in private law disputes and in relations between private individuals (however, the decision in the case of Marleasing insists on using only the provisions of directives themselves for resolution in such relations). A dispute is solved by using both the Member States law and the Community law, where the norms of the EU law provide the possibility of broad interpretation, and the internal rules provide for a maximum consideration of local traditions and characteristics with respect to the dispute. Marleasing should be introduced to the civil procedure activities of the judicial bodies of Ukraine. It is considered as recognition of the freedom of States to bring their own legal systems towards the European legal order through an evolutionary process of regulatory compatibility (parallel activity of the two systems: the national legislations of the EU Member States and the EU law in the context of their structural cooperation through a gradual harmonization and adaptation of national legislation with the EU law) without prejudice to their “legal rationality”.
Authors and Affiliations
Galyna Mykhailiuk
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP486179
- DOI 10.18523/2617-2607.2018.63-66
- Views 56
- Downloads 0
Принцип пропорційності у праві інтелектуальної власності ЄС
У статті розкрито сутність дії методологічного принципу інтерпретації Європейського суду справедливості Marleasing (походить від назви однієї зі сторін справи), що домінує у частині непозовного провадження та підтримуван...
Право на соціальні допомоги в умовах сьогодення: науково-теоретичний аспект
У статті розкрито питання, пов’язані із правовою характеристикою права на соціальні допомоги в умовах сьогодення. Наголошено на особливостях формування права на соціальні допомоги крізь призму права на соціальний захист....
Principles of Law: Features in the Law of Taxation
The principles of law belong to one of the fundamental concepts of law which has been studied by human thought for a long time. As fundamental principles, the principles of law find their legislative presentation in the...
Right to Social Security of Employment Migrants in European Union
The article deals with the issue of social security of employment of migrants from third-countries to the European Union. This publication gives a short overview of literature and more detailed outlook of international,...
Нормативно-правове забезпечення заохочень працівників органів місцевого самоврядування: сутність, проблеми та перспективи
У науковій статті досліджено проблематику та перспективи нормативно-правового забезпечення заохочень працівників органів місцевого самоврядування. Розглянуто проблеми, пов’язані з недостатнім нормативним урегулюванням за...