Reliability of power meter calibration by mathematical modelling of treadmill cycling
Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2014, Vol 3, Issue 2
Abstract
New power meters that are installed on various parts of the bike entered the market recently. Calibration of power meters is essential to ensure correct power output readings for testing and training. The use of a dynamic calibration rig was proposed as the preferred method to calibrate cycle ergometers (Woods et al., 1994: International Journal of Sports Medicine, 15(4), 168-171). While this works for power meters that measure power output after its transmission through the crank axle, it is not suitable for systems installed on the pedals or the crank arm (e.g. Garmin Vector, Kéo Power, Stages, Rotor Power). Therefore, we want to propose a new method to dynamically calibrate all available power meters. The purpose of our study was to quantify the typical error of this method used to assess load characteristics of power meters. Thirty power meters (14 SRM, 8 Powertap, 5 Quarq, 3 Garmin Vector) mainly used by cyclists of the Swiss national mountain bike team were analysed. Each cyclist rode his own bike equipped with his power meter on a motorized treadmill (Poma, Dürrröhrsdorf-Dittersbach, Germany), after executing all calibration procedures according to the manufacturer. Cyclists rode with a velocity v = 3.5 m s-1 at an inclination of α1 = 1° and α2 = 7°. These corresponded to power demands of approximately 1 W kg-1 and 5 W kg-1, respectively. Power output measurements were averaged over 1 min for both inclinations. The total mass m of the cyclist, his equipment and bike was measured on a calibrated scale (Model 861, Seca, Reinach, Switzerland). To eliminate any contribution of rolling or aerodynamic resistance, the difference in power output between the two inclinations was calculated as ΔP = m ∙ g ∙ v ∙ (sinα2 – sinα1). The ratio between the measured difference and that calculated by the mathematical model was defined as the load characteristic of the power meter. A value of 1 indicates perfect agreement between the measurement and the model. The procedure was performed twice. The typical error of measurement and its 95% confidence interval for the load characteristic was calculated from the 30 repeated trials (Hopkins, 2000: Sports Medicine, 30(1), 1-15). The typical error for the load characteristic was 1.5% with a 95% confidence interval of 1.1% to 1.9%. The change in the mean from trial 1 to trial 2 was 0.1% with a 95% confidence interval of -0.7% to 0.9%. The typical error of 1.5% demonstrates a high reliability of the method used to assess the load characteristic of a power meter, which can easily be enhanced by performing multiple trials. The value for a convenient triple measurement follows as 1.5% / 31/2 = 0.9% (Hopkins, 2000). The typical error presented here is comparable to the reliability reported for the calibration with a dynamic calibration rig (Woods et al., 1994). Our calibration method is easy to administer, time efficient and independent of the power meter system, rolling resistance or cyclist riding style. Even though the method does not assess absolute power output readings, it detects systematic measurement error. To further evaluate the load characteristic, an assumption concerning the drivetrain loss is necessary. After personal communication with J. Smith (www.friction-facts.com, December 6, 2013), we assume a drivetrain loss of 2% in power output difference scores. A valid system located on the crank would therefore measure a 2% higher difference in power output than predicted by the mathematical model. We conclude, that calibrating power meters by mathematical modelling of treadmill cycling is highly reliable and convenient.
Authors and Affiliations
T Maier| Section for Elite Sports, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport, Magglingen, Switzerland, T Steiner| Section for Elite Sports, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport, Magglingen, Switzerland, S Trösch| Section for Elite Sports, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport, Magglingen, Switzerland, B Müller| Section for Elite Sports, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport, Magglingen, Switzerland, JP Wehrlin| Section for Elite Sports, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport, Magglingen, Switzerland
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP2856
- DOI -
- Views 405
- Downloads 29
A measurement system for the bicycle crank angle using a wireless motion sensor attached to the crank arm
In this study, we propose a system for measuring the rotational angle of a bicycle crank arm. This system consists of a wireless motion sensor with bi-axial acceleration and angular velocity sensors attached to the crank...
Internal Mechanical Power During Cycling Using Non-Circular Versus Circular Chainrings
Introduction: Non-circular Rotor Q-Rings have been shown to increase tangential force during the pedalling downstroke compared to conventional circular chainrings1, and due to this advantage, have been proposed as a pote...
Reliability of power meter calibration by mathematical modelling of treadmill cycling
Background & Purpose. In cycling, several physiological values are taken into account to evaluate the performance level of each athlete and/or to plan his training program. One of these values is the maximal power output...
Spanish cycling and attitudes towards doping of different stakeholders involved
The aim of this study was to know and compare the attitudes towards doping among different groups involved in Spanish cycling: future physical trainers, elite cyclists, young cyclists, and cycling team managers. The samp...
The effect of aerodynamic characteristics on the drafting effect in track cycling
Since the aim of the men’s team pursuit is to accomplish a distance of 4000m as fast as possible, reducing aerodynamic drag by means of drafting can attribute in achieving this goal. Broker et al.1 quantified the average...