Revisiting the God of the Gaps
Journal Title: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy - Year 2012, Vol 9, Issue 0
Abstract
Although design arguments for the existence of God are sometimes dismissed as God of the Gaps apologetics, reasons for rejecting them based on the history of science, philosophy, religion, and pragmatism are not as compelling as is often implied. I argue that using multiple evidences of design in nature, with regular updates to accommodate new findings, can be a sound and convincing approach to apologetics.
Authors and Affiliations
Ronald Larson
CSI and Explanatory Filter: Dembski’s Trial by Fire
Author presents the explanatory filter concept formulated by intelligent design theory proponent William A. Dembski. The filter is intended to be an universal instrument for detecting design that is not only the work of...
Second Thoughts on Naturalistic Theism and Model of Levels of Analysis: A Response to Mark Harris
I shall show that Dr. Harris’ study of biblical scholarship is treated in a very serious manner in my paper, as it is the element identifying him as a representative of naturalistic theism (NT). NT is a position that has...
On the Research Program of Intelligent Design Theory
According to intelligent design theory, certain biological and cosmic phenomena were designed by an intelligent being that could just as well be natural as supernatural, and this design is scientifically detectable. Howe...
Geneza idei epistemicznych układów odniesienia i ich odmiany
Nazwa „epistemiczny układ odniesienia” została wprowadzona przez Kazimierza Jodkowskiego w 2004 roku i jest efektem jego uprzednich analiz sporu ewolucjonizmu z kreacjonizmem. Epistemiczne układy odniesienia to niewielki...
Romanes: Religion and Science
The article presents George John Romanes’ view on the relation between religion and science. Romanes was nineteenth century English evolutionary biologist interested also in theology. According to Romanes, the task of sc...