Rozstrzyganie polubowne sporów związanych z rejestracją domen internetowych – cz. I
Journal Title: ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 36
Abstract
Arbitration is certainly not free from defects, which shows the practice of law, often inconsistent and it poses many problems. It was recognized, however, that this formula still works better than the use of courts of general jurisdiction. Another thing is that the powers of arbitration panels are limited and actually come down to determine the rights or lack of rights to the domain, which is not always sufficient from the point of view of the entities involved in the proceedings. As I have shown in this study, arbitration works on several levels. First of all, it is important that matters concerning .pl domains fall under the jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration for Internet Domains with the Polish Chamber of Information Technology and Telecommunications, the .eu – European body, i.e. the Arbitration Center for .EU Disputes. Moreover, in many cases it is necessary to ask the subordinate body of the World Intellectual Property Organization, which decides each year a number of issues relating to domain.com. In addition, the parties may individually and according to their needs define the rules by which their dispute will be recognized – all principles must be included in the contract. However, most agreements are laconic records and any disputes arising from the contract are subject to arbitration. With this general record, the parties must realize that their freedom is limited and the arbitration proceedings will take place on the basis of provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. In summary, the institution amicable settlement is certainly useful and functional, but brings a lot of practical problems which are not easy to solve. The multitude of cases regarding domains indicates, however, the need for the existence of such bodies and the continuous improvement of legal solutions in this topic. Because the statistics speak for themselves, from year to year, there is a growing number of "domain” disputes, which are demanding the right of greater precision in the functioning of the bodies responsible for the settlement of these disputes
Authors and Affiliations
Marta Kamińska
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP181935
- DOI -
- Views 47
- Downloads 0
Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza arbitra
Performance of the function of an arbitrator in a court of arbitration comes with a range of duties that can, in practice, be performed improperly or even not at all. Failure by the arbitrator to exercise due diligence i...
Prywatne nagranie przebiegu mediacji jako źródło dowodowe a tajemnica przedsiębiorstwa.
Contemporary technology gives almost unlimited opportunities of recording any behaviors and activities and any individual takes (wiretapping, private audio or video recordings, GPS, LBS). The article focuses on recording...
Zasady słuszności jako zasady postępowania przed sądem polubownym
This article sheds light over a possible use of application of the principle of equity as a core principle of procedure governing arbitration. Notwithstanding the principle of equity being treated as the grounds of an ar...
Zapis na sąd polubowny z udziałem konsumenta – uwagi na tle regulacji z art. 1164[1] KPC – część I
Przepis art. 11641 KPC został wprowadzony na mocy art. 48 pkt 1 ustawy z 23.9.2016 r. o pozasądowym rozwiązywaniu sporów konsumenckich, która weszła w życie 10.1.2017 r. Inicjatywa ustawodawcza w przedmiotowym zakresie z...
Interim measures in commercial arbitration – general overview in the context of Polish regulations
Arbitration has become an equal and important alternative for resolution of disputes, especially those where parties conduct cross-border commercial activity. In many cases national courts are less suitable for settlemen...