ЩОДО РОЗМЕЖУВАННЯ ПОНЯТЬ «МЕДІАЦІЯ», «ДОСУДОВЕ УРЕГУЛЮВАННЯ СПОРУ» ТА «УРЕГУЛЮВАННЯ СПОРУ ЗА УЧАСТЮ СУДДІ»

Abstract

The article distinguishes between such alternative dispute resolution measures as mediation, pre-trial settlement of disputes and settlement of disputes involving a judge. It is proved that these terms are often regarded by researchers and practicing lawyers as identical. The concept and basic principles of the concepts “mediation”, “pre-trial settlement of a dispute” and “settlement of a dispute involving a judge” concepts are investigated. There are six characteristics used in order to differ above-mentioned concepts namely: by regulation sources; by subject (participants in the settlement of the dispute); by procedure; by arrangement; by the timing of; by consequences. It is revealed that mediation in Ukraine currently has practically no legal regulation. In particular, the draft Law of Ukraine “On Mediation” was submitted at the beginning of 2019 for adoption in the second reading to the Parliament. According to this draft Law, the mediator is an independent person that helps the parties to find a compromise facilitating agreement between the parties but not to resolve the dispute itself. The choice of a mediator is carried out by the parties jointly and arbitrary. The pre-trial settlement of economic disputes is carried out on the basis of the Economic Code of Ukraine through the lettering of the parties. One party (the applicant) sends another party (the recipient) the letter of claim, containing all the applicant’s claims and their legal grounds. Thus, in this kind of the out-ofcourt settlement, the search for a compromise is carried out by the parties themselves without the involvement of any other persons. The settlement of a dispute involving a judge is made by agreement of the parties prior to the commencement of the consideration of the case on the merits by the judge-rapporteur. This option is available regardless of the composition of the court. Such a settlement is carried out in the form of joint and (or) closed meetings. The person judge in this kind of the settlement is identified by the automatic case distribution system of the court. So the parties are not empowered to choose the judge arbitrary. However, if there is no amicable agreement as an outcome of the settlement of the dispute involving a judge, the case is to be transferred to another judge. Another one settlement of the dispute involving a judge is not allowed.

Authors and Affiliations

Т. В. Степанова

Keywords

Related Articles

ОБСТАВИНИ, ЯКІ ВРАХОВУЮТЬСЯ СЛІДЧИМИ СУДДЯМИ ПІД ЧАС ОБРАННЯ ЗАПОБІЖНОГО ЗАХОДУ У ВИГЛЯДІ ТРИМАННЯ ПІД ВАРТОЮ

This article is devoted to the analysis of circumstances which should be taken into account by investigating judges in choosing measures of restrain in a form of detention. Scientific article provides an analysis of the...

КРУЇЗ ЯК ДОГОВІР ПРО НАДАННЯ ТУРИСТИЧНИХ ПОСЛУГ

This article considers a cruise as a contract for the provision of travel services. The author’s definition of a contract for the provision of travel services is proposed: under a contract for the provision of travel ser...

ГОЛОВНІ ПРАВИЛА ПЕРЕГОВОРІВ ПІД ЧАС МАСОВИХ ЗАВОРУШЕНЬ ІЗ КОНФЛІКТНИМИ ОСОБАМИ ПЕВНОЇ ФОРМИ ПОВЕДІНКИ

The author in this article described tactical-psychological peculiarities of negotiations by the police officers of the preventive communication Group of preventive activity Department of Chief department of National pol...

ОСОБЛИВОСТІ КРИМІНОЛОГІЧНОЇ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ ЛАТЕНТНОЇ (ПРИХОВАНОЇ) ЗЛОЧИННОСТІ

In the article the author analyzes the essence of the main points of view regarding the definition of concealment of a crime, the direct definition of the nature and causes of latent crime, i.e. its criminological charac...

КОНСТИТУЦІЙНІ ЗАСАДИ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЇ МІСЦЕВОГО САМОВРЯДУВАННЯ В ПОЛЬЩІ, ЧЕХІЇ, УКРАЇНІ: КОМПАРАТИВНИЙ АНАЛІЗ

The article analyzes the principles of local self-government in Poland and the Czech Republic as the main countries of the European Union, that situated in the Eastern Europe, which were in the past in the socialist camp...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP607964
  • DOI -
  • Views 67
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Т. В. Степанова (2018). ЩОДО РОЗМЕЖУВАННЯ ПОНЯТЬ «МЕДІАЦІЯ», «ДОСУДОВЕ УРЕГУЛЮВАННЯ СПОРУ» ТА «УРЕГУЛЮВАННЯ СПОРУ ЗА УЧАСТЮ СУДДІ». Південноукраїнський правничий часопис, 4(1), 24-27. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-607964