Special aspects of responsibility of the principal offender for commission of the crimes with two forms of guilt

Journal Title: Проблеми законності - Year 2016, Vol 133, Issue 133

Abstract

In the article the author analyzed the views of scientists on the issue of existence of complicity in the crimes with two forms of guilt. The author drew a conclusion that the confines of complicity as joint intentional participation in commission of intentional crime include nothing else than an act or an act and causation of basic consequence. An aggravated consequence caused by the principal offender through negligence is outside complicity because the joint intent to its commission is absent. The author substantiated the necessity for inculpation an aggravated consequence caused by the principal offender through negligence others accomplices if they had a duty and possibility to envisage it. Determining of the confines of knowing nature of an act of the principal offender of others accomplices as the joint result of their interrelated acts is recognized as prerequisite for inculpation them this consequence. Causation an aggravated consequence through negligence of intentional crime jointly by several persons that had a duty and possibility to envisage it is recognized as jointly causation through negligence. The author suggested examine the subjects of causation this consequence that had a duty and possibility to envisage it not as accomplices but as co-causers, each of them individually liable for its causation. The author distinguished the groups of crimes that have an aggravated consequence which is outside complicity. The author suggested the ways of qualification the crime with two forms of guilt subject to existence of the elements of complicity.

Authors and Affiliations

Ірина Зінов’єва

Keywords

Related Articles

Публічно-приватне партнерство як спосіб забезпечення сталого розвитку сільських територій

Досліджено сутність публічно-приватного партнерства та його ознаки відповідно до між- народного законодавства. З’ясовано, що модель публічно-приватного партнерства може стати в Україні одним із способів забезпечення стал...

Methodology of formation of special regime of the innovation activities: articulation of issue

The concept, functional types and the basic features of special regimes of management were considered. The Ukrainian legislation contains no definition of a special legal regime. However, the academic lawyers had worked...

Европейское оборонное сообщество: истоки становления интеграции в оборонной сфере

Исследуются вопросы, связанные со становлением европейской интеграции в оборонной сфере. Проанализированы предпосылки разработки Договора о Европейском оборонном сообществе и причины провала его ратификации. Раскрыта ро...

Применение судами Украины сверхимперативных норм при рассмотрении дел, возникающих из трансграничной недобросовестной конкуренции

Рассматриваются проблемные вопросы применения сверхимперативных норм конкурентного законодательства Украины при рассмотрении судами дел, осложнённых иностранным элементом. Анализируются подходы различных учёных относител...

Використання правової доктрини судовими органами

У статті аналізуються особливості використання правової доктрини судовими органами України. Охарактеризовано основні причини відсутності усталеної практики цитування в судових рішеннях наукових праць.

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP174664
  • DOI 10.21564/2414-990x.133.67449
  • Views 85
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ірина Зінов’єва (2016). Special aspects of responsibility of the principal offender for commission of the crimes with two forms of guilt. Проблеми законності, 133(133), 178-191. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-174664