СТРУКТУРА СУДОВОГО РІШЕННЯ В АДМІНІСТРАТИВНІЙ СПРАВІ THE STRUCTURE OF COURT DECISION IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE CASE

Abstract

Досліджено структуру судового рішення в адміністративній справі. Визначено поняття судового рішення як акту правосуддя та процесуального документа та доведено самостій- ність структури форми, яка може не збігатися зі змістом судового рішення як акту правосуд- дя. Як акт судової влади судове рішення має трикомпонентну структуру і складається з предмета, підстави та змісту. Судове рішення – процесуальний документ, який є зовнішньою формою виразу акту судової влади, складається із чотирьох елементів: вступної, описової, мотивувальної та резолютивної частин. Охарактеризовано вимоги до відповідних частин су- дових рішень в адміністративному процесі та запропоновано відповідні зміни до законодавства. The article deals with the structure of the court decision in an administrative case. The author defines the concept of a court decision as an act of justice and a procedural document, which has a separated structure form, and may not coincide with the content of the judgment as an act of justice. The act of judgment judiciary has ternary structure consists of subject and grounds maintenance. Court decision as a procedural document which is the external form of the act of justice expression consists of four elements: introduction, narrative, reasoning and the operative parts. The author defines the characteristic requirements of the relevant parts of judgments in the administrative process and proposes necessary amendments to the legislation. The introduction of court decision performs the function of the judicial act and allows us to establish when and where particular dispute between the parties was resolved and which was the subject of the dispute. Narrative of a court decision performs the information function, that enables both persons involved in the case, and a higher court without investigation of the case to form a general opinion on the composition and amount of the alleged claim, their reason and justification related to the claim of defendant, amount of researched evidence. The reasoning part of the court decision is intended to provide certainty and objective expression of the true circumstances of the case, point to evidence that these circumstances are confirmed and applied to the circumstances relevant legal provisions. In the reasoning of the court decision stated the law and regulations - regulations on which defined the rights and obligations of the parties and disputed legal and procedural rules of law which the court was guided by established facts of the case and the rights and obligations of the parties. The act of the resolution contains authoritative court order regarding claims, comprising an opinion to satisfy or refuse them, and the court applied the type (method) judicial protection of rights or legally protected interest by solving existent disputes between the parties on the merits. The content of the resolution part can provide basic and optional elements. The main elements are : a) to satisfy administrative action or refuse it; b) to make a court decision on the merits; c) a court order by the distribution of court costs. As optional elements, depending on the specific subject of a court command and ways of its implementation to the resolution of the court may be included : timing and execution of the order; court command that a judgment must be enforced. In addition, the resolution contains court judgments, including the procedure and time of appeal.

Authors and Affiliations

Marta Trush

Keywords

Related Articles

THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE WITNESSES UNDER ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (D) OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS

The article is devoted to the current case-law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the right to examine a witness as a guarantee of the right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention of Huma...

СТАНОВЛЕННЯ У ГАЛИЧИНІ ОРГАНІВ МІСЦЕВОЇ ВЛАДИ І САМОВРЯДУВАННЯ У 1772–1918 РОКАХ ESTABLISHING OF GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND MUNICIPALITIES IN GALICIA IN 1772–1918

Подано огляд розвитку органів місцевої влади та самоврядування на території коронного краю Галичини і Лодомерії у складі Австрії та Австро-Угорщини в 1772–1918 років. Особливу увагу приділено дослідженню нормативно-право...

CONSEQUENCES OF THE ALAND ISLANDS’ MEMBERSHIP IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: OUTLINE OF THE PROBLEM

The article examines the process and consequences of the integration of the Aland Islands into the European Community. The author considers the special position of the Aland Islands in the Finnish and international law a...

UNICAMERALISM AS A FEATURE OF ESTONIAN PARLIAMENT

This article aims to present the parliament of the Republic of Estonia. In the article the analyse of legislative regulations and practices of Estonian parliament with the emphasis on the typical features of unicameral p...

ПРО СВОБОДУ ПЕРЕМІЩЕННЯ ПРАЦІВНИКІВ КРАЇНАМИ ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКОГО СОЮЗУ

The article is devoted to the clarification of the right to free movement of employees and some other persons with the purpose of employment in the European Union. The content of the freedom of employees’ movement is ana...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP183638
  • DOI -
  • Views 88
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Marta Trush (2016). СТРУКТУРА СУДОВОГО РІШЕННЯ В АДМІНІСТРАТИВНІЙ СПРАВІ THE STRUCTURE OF COURT DECISION IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE CASE. Вiсник Львівського Університету, Серія юридична, 62(), 128-137. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-183638