СТРУКТУРА ТА ЗМІСТ ЗБИРАННЯ ДОКАЗІВ ЯК ЕТАПУ ЇХ ФОРМУВАННЯ ПІД ЧАС КРИМІНАЛЬНОГО ПРОЦЕСУАЛЬНОГО ДОКАЗУВАННЯ
Journal Title: Південноукраїнський правничий часопис - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 2
Abstract
The article is devoted to the research of the collection of evidences as a stage of their formation during the criminal procedural proof. The generalization of the positions of the scholars, who turned to the problems of the collection of evidences in the criminal proceedings, testifies to giving them an independent meaning to the stages of gathering evidences: the detection, the search, the fixing, the documenting, the demanding, the extracting, the storing (preserving). Depending on the author’s approach to the definition of the structure of criminal procedural proof, scientists use the above stages in different combinations and often put in them different content, which necessitates the disclosure of each of them. The content of the stages of the collection of evidences, offered by the scientists, is revealed: the detection, the search, the fixing, the documenting, the demanding, the extracting, the storing (preserving). Based on the analysis of theoretical concepts, the expediency of separation in the structure of the collection of evidences of two parts has been substantiated: 1) the obtaining of the evidences (during the pre-trial investigation – by the sides of the criminal proceedings by means of the methods, specified in part 2–4 article 93 of the CPC of Ukraine, and during court trial – by the court as a result of judicial proceedings, provided in articles 332, 333, 351–361 of the CPC of Ukraine); 2) the fixing of the evidences. Taking into account the combination in criminal procedural proof of cognitive and identity activities, the obtaining of evidences serves as the cognitive side of the of activity of subject of proof and their fixing – as its identity side. In aggregate, the obtaining and the fixing of evidences allows to fully disclosing the content of the collection of evidences as a stage of their formation during the criminal procedural proof. Separation in the structure of the collection of evidences of other parts is superfluous, since they are covered by the content of the indicated stages (the detection, the search, the documenting, the demanding, the extracting of evidences) or are not the part of the structure of criminal procedural proof (the storing of evidences).
Authors and Affiliations
С. О. Ковальчук
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP608264
- DOI -
- Views 106
- Downloads 2
ГОЛОВНІ ПРАВИЛА ПЕРЕГОВОРІВ ПІД ЧАС МАСОВИХ ЗАВОРУШЕНЬ ІЗ КОНФЛІКТНИМИ ОСОБАМИ ПЕВНОЇ ФОРМИ ПОВЕДІНКИ
The author in this article described tactical-psychological peculiarities of negotiations by the police officers of the preventive communication Group of preventive activity Department of Chief department of National pol...
ПРОФІЛАКТИКА ЕКСПЛУАТАЦІЇ ДІТЕЙ
The article is devoted to research of directions of preventive maintenance of exploitation of children. Taking into account the analysis carried out in the article on the methods of preventing the exploitation of childre...
ЗНАЧЕННЯ ПОЛОЖЕНЬ ХАРТІЇ ОСНОВНИХ ПРАВ ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКОГО СОЮЗУ ДЛЯ МОДЕРНІЗАЦІЇ ЗАКРІПЛЕНИХ У КОНСТИТУЦІЇ УКРАЇНИ ПРАВ І СВОБОД ЛЮДИНИ
The author, based on the analysis of the provisions of the Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union set out the level of international law guaranteeing fundamental human rights and norms which povinnosti a mod...
ІСТОРИКО-ПРАВОВИЙ АСПЕКТ РОЗВИТКУ СПАДКОВОГО ПРАВА В УКРАЇНІ
In the article the question of historical development of institute of inheritance is considered in Ukraine. A probate law is a major and oldest institute of civil law of Ukraine, that envisages every human rights on an i...
ЗАСТОСУВАННЯ ЗАХОДІВ ПОДАТКОВОГО ПРИМУСУ У РАЗІ НЕНАЛЕЖНОГО ВИКОНАННЯ ПОДАТКОВОГО ОБОВ’ЯЗКУ
The article is devoted to the actual issues of application of coercive measures to taxpayers in case of untimely implementation of their tax liability. The purpose of this work is to determine the structure of the syste...