Subalternity as Margin and Center of Anachronistic Discourse

Journal Title: Çankaya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences - Year 2019, Vol 13, Issue 1

Abstract

Subalternity is a concept that has taken on many different meanings across multiple schools of thought. Beginning with Gramsci, subalternity described the unique position of rural workers as powerless and problematic to the Marxist dialectic. Following the English translation of Gramsci, the Subaltern Studies group extended the position of the subaltern into the post-colonial heterogeneity of rural space. Within this context, through Gayatri Spivak’s concept of the subaltern as rural postcolonial woman, subalternity becomes a condition of speechlessness. From Spivak’s reworking of subalternity, US third world feminism has developed a theory of difference and a mode of resistance. Meanwhile, Gramsci scholars have criticized these transformations of Gramsci’s concept of subalternity as anachronistic. They contend that each of the appropriations from Gramsci have further obscured Gramsci’s concept of subalternity producing a theory far from that envisioned by Gramsci. However, as specified by Gramsci, faithful readings and applications of outdated concepts becomes an “anachronism in one’s own time” (Gramsci, Selections, 628). Thus, while the Subaltern Studies group, Spivak and US third world feminism have resignified Gramsci’s subalternity from the rural south of Italian agricultural workers to the voicelessness of the post-colonial woman, their resignifications of subalternity are a development of theory that transcends the texts of Gramsci. This paper argues that Spivak’s and US third world feminism’s revision of subalternity avoids the Gramscian anachronism while developing a theory of both the state of subalternity and the escape of subalternity on “the long road toward hegemony” (Spivak, A Critique of Post-Colonial Reason, 310).

Authors and Affiliations

Patrick Matthew Farr

Keywords

Related Articles

Teaching Critical Discourse Analysis in English and French

The present paper studies the importance of teaching Critical Discourse Analysis, and the challenges of teaching the same subject both in English and in French. Following the proposal of a comparative analysis of the US...

Language in the War-Zone: The Power of Translation in Rajiv Joseph’s Bengal Tiger at the Baghdad Zoo

In the backdrop of 9/11, the two subsequent invasions in Afghanistan and Iraq sparked the imagination of British and American playwrights for creating political plays which protest the futility of wars and conflicts. Ben...

Recasting Africanness: Ignatius Sancho and the Question of Identity

The prejudice against blacks, a designation which in eighteenth-century British context describes all non-white people, including people from India, Africa, and the Caribbean, is what I tag Africanness. Africanness descr...

Using Translation in Foreign Language Teaching to Understand a Foreign Culture

The purpose of this paper is to explain how teaching a foreign language benefits from taking images of its culture into account, through presentation of curiosities related to the respective culture, cultural background...

Literary Genres vis-à-vis: Novel-Masnavi and the Position of the Narrator

This article aims to focus on the problem of whether masnavi, one of the most significant narrative forms in Ottoman poetry, and novel, as a narrative form that became popular in Ottoman literature through the Westerniza...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP594515
  • DOI -
  • Views 143
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Patrick Matthew Farr (2019). Subalternity as Margin and Center of Anachronistic Discourse. Çankaya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 13(1), 62-78. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-594515