Superiority of Imam from the Viewpoint of Theological Denominations
Journal Title: جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام - Year 2010, Vol 42, Issue 84
Abstract
One of the Imam's features, which has been controversial among the Muslim theologians is his superiority over other people of the community (umma). From their viewpoint, superiority is brought up in two aspects: first, superiority as surplus of nobility and reward with God; and the second, superiority in attributes, which is a condition for apparent Imamate. Imāmiyya theologians unanimously view the superiority in both aspects as among the prerequisites for Imamate. This issue was first set forth by the Shī‘as so as by relying on the superiority of their Imams they would prove the rightfulness of their Imamate. As for the people who were appointed as government officials, such as governors, military commanders, and judges, although superiority is not an absolute condition, they are to be superior over the subjects in what they are in charge of; and in no way the precedence of the inferior (mafḍūl) over the superior (fāḍil) is permissible. But, the Sunni theologians have had no unanimous and consistent viewpoint. Some have theoretically supported the necessity of a superior Imam and have regarded the order of the caliphs in its historical reality in the order of their superiority. However, most of the Mu’tazilites and Ash’arites have not necessarily deemed advisable the superior Imamate and have, under the pretext of protecting the umma’s interests, opined for the permissibility of inferior Imam despite the presence of the superior one. Each group has resorted to some evidence from the Book, Sunna, consensus (ijmā‘), and intellect to prove their own claim. Given that the acceptance of each one of these two bases would have a profound impact on outlining the politico-governmental structure of Islam, this article seeks to explain and critically review their viewpoints in this respect.
Authors and Affiliations
‘Alī Riḍā NajafzāDa
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP202547
- DOI 10.22067/philosophy.v42i1.11244
- Views 141
- Downloads 0
The Relation of Awwal, Ākhar, Ẓāhir, and Bāṭin to the Perfect Human Being
In theoretical mysticism, many of the mystical issues are attributed to the Qur'ānīc verses, among which is the noble verse "He is the First, He is the Last, He is the Manifest, He is the Unmanifest." The mystics have mo...
The Paradox of Absolute Nonexistent and its Parallel Propositions
The misconception (shubha) of absolute nonexistent – which we have named as paradox – is not an amusing brainteaser; rather, it is one the significant epistemological issues. Its importance can be looked upon from two di...
Social Classes in the Viewpoint of Khwāja Nasīr al-Dīn tūsī
Khwāja Naṣīr al-Dīn Ṭūsī is one of the greatest thinkers of the middle centuries (AH), who enjoys a high status in science and literature and has a worldwide reputation. Naṣīr al-Dīn Ṭūsī did not suffice himself merely w...
A Comparative Study of Human Will in the Philosophy of Spinoza and Ustād Muṭahharī
This writing makes a comparison between the viewpoints of two Western and Islamic philosophers, Ustād Muṭahharī and Spinoza, concerning human will. Each one of these philosophers has presented views about human free will...
Examining the Approach of the Holocaust Purporters in their Juridical Protection of the Massacred Jews
The Zionist Jews have started widespread attempts and set up extensive propagations in countries over the world in order to attach importance to the Holocaust. They believe that the massacre of the Jews and the occurrenc...