Superiority of Imam from the Viewpoint of Theological Denominations
Journal Title: جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام - Year 2010, Vol 42, Issue 84
Abstract
One of the Imam's features, which has been controversial among the Muslim theologians is his superiority over other people of the community (umma). From their viewpoint, superiority is brought up in two aspects: first, superiority as surplus of nobility and reward with God; and the second, superiority in attributes, which is a condition for apparent Imamate. Imāmiyya theologians unanimously view the superiority in both aspects as among the prerequisites for Imamate. This issue was first set forth by the Shī‘as so as by relying on the superiority of their Imams they would prove the rightfulness of their Imamate. As for the people who were appointed as government officials, such as governors, military commanders, and judges, although superiority is not an absolute condition, they are to be superior over the subjects in what they are in charge of; and in no way the precedence of the inferior (mafḍūl) over the superior (fāḍil) is permissible. But, the Sunni theologians have had no unanimous and consistent viewpoint. Some have theoretically supported the necessity of a superior Imam and have regarded the order of the caliphs in its historical reality in the order of their superiority. However, most of the Mu’tazilites and Ash’arites have not necessarily deemed advisable the superior Imamate and have, under the pretext of protecting the umma’s interests, opined for the permissibility of inferior Imam despite the presence of the superior one. Each group has resorted to some evidence from the Book, Sunna, consensus (ijmā‘), and intellect to prove their own claim. Given that the acceptance of each one of these two bases would have a profound impact on outlining the politico-governmental structure of Islam, this article seeks to explain and critically review their viewpoints in this respect.
Authors and Affiliations
‘Alī Riḍā NajafzāDa
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP202547
- DOI 10.22067/philosophy.v42i1.11244
- Views 130
- Downloads 0
Descending Infinite Regress in Yemeni Philosophy
Infinite regress is among the most important philosophical issues which is imaginable in three forms: ascending, descending, and a combination of the two. Philosophers have considered the invalidity of infinite regress a...
Recognition of the Border between Delegation and Unconditional Guardianship
Belief in the lofty positions and excellences of the Shi’īte Imams (A.S.) and having faith in their miraculous acts and dominion over the world affairs underlies the authentic doctrine of unconditional guardianship (wilā...
"This is the Way and the Only Way" Critical Review of the Possibility of Recognizing the Religious Pluralism Approach in Teachings of Jainism and Buddhism
Employment of the famous story of "the Blind Men and the Elephant" by some philosophers of religion in religious pluralism discourses, which is originally brought up first in the texts of Jainism and then Buddhism, can l...
Critique of Mu’ayyid al-Dīn Jandī’s Theory on Ibn ‘Arabī’s being the Seal of the Saints of Allah (Khātam al-Awliyā)
One of the significant discourses of theoretical mysticism in Islam is the discussion about khātam al-awliyā (seal of the Saints). Mystics believe whatever exists in the world of being is a locus of manifestation for the...
A Study of ‘Allāma Ṭabāṭabā’ī’s Viewpoint on Knowledge
The late ‘Allāma viewed knowledge (‘ilm) as an existential entity and agreed with Ṣadr al-Muti’allihīn in this respect, saying that knowledge is the presence of an object for an object, i.e. achievement of knowledge for...