The Authenticity Issue in the Interpretation of Human Rights:Critical Review of Mohammed Ghazali's Islamic View on UDHR

Journal Title: The Journal of Human Rights - Year 2011, Vol 5, Issue 2

Abstract

The contemporary debates, among religious thinkers, over the relationship between religion and politics necessarily involve the relationship between right and obligation. Mohammed Ghazali is among those thinkers who believe in the priority of right over obligation, contributing authenticity to the Islamic rather than western interpretations of Human rights. His failure in the mission is clear. He is much more concerned with showing the compatibility Islamic teachings with human rights principles than with the relationship of these principles with Islamic teachings. Apparently he tries to show the “authenticity”, of Islamic vis-à-vis Western readings of human rights, however in practice he bases his arguments on the “authenticity” of the western reading of human rights putting his perceived Islam inferior to Western principles of human rights. چکیده متفکران دینی که در دوران معاصر به نسبت دین و سیاست می‌پردازند، ناگزیر از تبیین نسبت «حق» و «تکلیف» شهروندان هستند. محمد غزالی از جمله متفکرانی است که با تفسیری حق‌محور به سراغ دلالت‌های سیاسی آموزه‌های دینی می‌رود و در این میان، اصالت را به تفسیر اسلامی از حقوق بشر می‌دهد و نه تفاسیر غربی آن. با این حال، در دغدغه خود برای اصیل معرفی‌کردن آموزه دینی در این زمینه ناکام می‌ماند. او که بیش از آنکه دغدغه نسبت‌سنجی اصول حقوق بشر با آموزه‌های اسلامی را داشته باشد، دل‌آشوب نشان دادن انطباق آموزه‌های اسلامی با این اصول است و به ‌ظاهر اگرچه در تلاش خود برای نشان دادن «اصالت» خوانش اسلام‌گرایانه در مقابل خوانش غربی از حقوق بشر است، در عملْ اصول غربیِ حقوق بشر را «اصل» گرفته و اسلامِ منظورِ نظر خویش را در ذیل آن و چونان ابزار توجیه‌گری برای آن معرفی می‌نماید.

Authors and Affiliations

Morteza Bahrani, Seyed Mohsen Alavipour

Keywords

Related Articles

Power, Dialogue and Peace

In order to achieve peace and prevent violence as their longtime dream, human beings have tested various ways so far, including the strengthening of individual conscience, legislation, establishment of law enforcement in...

Religious Identity, Difference, and Human Rights

Religion is a dominant factor in the identity of individuals as well as of peoples. The identity of individuals concerning their religion is a highly private matter. In forming a people’s identity religion is of public i...

Human Rights, Human Security and Political Theologies

Human rights, particularly in the form of international human rights law, intersect with religion and peace at foundational levels, as symbolically highlighted by the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Th...

Sovereignty of States and International Law Documents: Impressing or Impressed?

Sovereign States which originally were the sole actors in international society, in the course of the humanization of international law have been submitted to some commitments which are mostly of human rights nature. Suc...

Examining the Reasons for the Non-Stipulation of the Constitution on the Condition of Gender in the Authority of High Ranking Political Officials

This article seeks to analyze the principles of constitution review in the constitution stipulating gender leadership. Despite the prevailing view in the tradition Sex for leadership, as the highest political office, but...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP303596
  • DOI -
  • Views 117
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Morteza Bahrani, Seyed Mohsen Alavipour (2011). The Authenticity Issue in the Interpretation of Human Rights:Critical Review of Mohammed Ghazali's Islamic View on UDHR. The Journal of Human Rights, 5(2), 3-18. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-303596