The Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 3
Abstract
Individual differences in decision making are a topic of longstanding interest, but often yield inconsistent and contradictory results. After providing an overview of individual difference measures that have commonly been used in judgment and decision-making (JDM) research, we suggest that our understanding of individual difference effects in JDM may be improved by amending our approach to studying them. We propose four recommendations for improving the pursuit of individual differences in JDM research: a more systematic approach; more theory-driven selection of measures; a reduced emphasis on main effects in favor of interactions between individual differences and decision features, situational factors, and other individual differences; and more extensive communication of results (whether significant or null, published or unpublished). As a first step, we offer our database—the Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory (DMIDI; html://www.sjdm.org/dmidi), a free, public resource that categorizes and describes the most common individual difference measures used in JDM research.
Authors and Affiliations
Kirstin C. Appelt, Kerry F. Milch, Michel J. J. Handgraaf and Elke U. Weber
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677796
- DOI -
- Views 138
- Downloads 0
Normative arguments from experts and peers reduce delay discounting
When making decisions that involve tradeoffs between the quality and timing of desirable outcomes, people consistently discount the value of future outcomes. A puzzling finding regarding such decisions is the extremely h...
Maximizing and customer loyalty: Are maximizers less loyal?
Despite their efforts to choose the best of all available solutions, maximizers seem to be more inclined than satisficers to regret their choices and to experience post-decisional dissonance. Maximizers may therefore be...
Reluctant altruism and peer pressure in charitable giving
Subjects donate individually (control group) or in pairs (treatment group). Those in pairs reveal their donation decision to each other. Average donations in the treatment group are significantly higher than in the contr...
Numeracy, frequency, and Bayesian reasoning
Previous research has demonstrated that Bayesian reasoning performance is improved if uncertainty information is presented as natural frequencies rather than single-event probabilities. A questionnaire study of 342 colle...
Is broad bracketing always better? How broad decision framing leads to more optimal preferences over repeated gambles
The effect of choice bracketing — the consideration of repeated decisions as a set versus in isolation — has important implications for products that are inherently time-sensitive and entail varying levels of risk, inclu...