The evolution of Khul’ divorce theory in Shiite jurisprudence
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2016, Vol 48, Issue 104
Abstract
This article aims, with a detailed insight into the historical process of Khul’ divorce in two phases in Arabia before Islam and after Islam, to discover the creation of successive theories and the evolution of ‘the Khul’ divorce institution’ to its current form as supporting Iranian legislation. While presenting the views of the jurists, we encountered two streams of thought as regards the dissolution of the marriage by the woman, and this indicates the sparkling of a new idea in this legal institution and the distancing from the point of view of early jurists (Ibn Bābawayh, Shaikh Sadūq, Seyyed Murtaza). The first idea was known as ‘the necessity of Khul’ divorce’, founded by Abul-Salah Halabi and substantiated by Allameh Helli; but, their views in this regard channeled a deviant current. From the beginning of this period, and to follow Sallar Deylami, Khul’ was categorized as a kind of divorce from the side of the husband. The second type of idea known as swap Khul’ was originated by Mirza Qumī and the Second Martyr (Shahīd Thānī). After extracting these two theories and by inspiration from the views of the early jurists, it seems that we can review the current ‘Khul’ divorce institution’ and establish a new theory.
Authors and Affiliations
Maryam Sadat Mohaghegh
The Role of Referring Pronoun to some Common Individuals
Sometimes there comes a pronoun after a common [individual], which has apparently been used as the object of a legal decision (ḥukm), and by means of external evidence, the certainty is achieved that this pronoun refers...
Proportion of Ordinance and Subject: Functions and Mechanism of Recognition in the Jurists’ Expression
One of the requisites for proper understanding of the legal statutes (nuṣūṣ) is that the legislator and the jurist, along with other wise people in various scenes of life, should enjoy collective wisdom and, besides havi...
Examining the jurisprudential ruling on the prohibition of keeping books of deviation
The prohibition of keeping some books referred to as ‘books of deviation’ has been included in books of jurisprudence since the past to the present. The definition of deviation (and conformity) and misguidance (and guida...
An Analysis of Suspension in Cancellation of Contract in Imāmī Jurisprudence and French Law
Despite the claimed consensus concerning the cancellation of suspension in signing a contract, certain suspended institutions (established laws) can be found in Imāmī jurisprudence, which are very similar to "suspension...
Internet panderism from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence
Internet panderism, in today’s society, is a crime which, due to technological advances, has spread significantly and perhaps, in comparison to traditional panderism, it causes far more losses. Since it is unprecedented,...