The Standardized Aspect of the Dictionaries of Lithuanian Terms of Physics
Journal Title: Santalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija - Year 2009, Vol 17, Issue 2
Abstract
Single physical terms, words which became terms, can be found in the papers of our standard language founders J. Bretkūnas, M. Daukša, D. Kleinas, J. Rėza, S. Vaišnoras, B. Vilentas in the 16th–17th cc. K. Sirvydas’ trilingual (Polish-Latin-Lithuanian) dictionary “Dictionarium trium linguarum”, the first edition of which appeared in1620, had a great influence on the development of standard language lexis. However, the terminology of physics began to develop much later. Its evolution can be divided in three stages:1) the middle of the 19th c – the end of the 19th c, when the first articles, published in Keleivis (1849–1880) and Aušra (1883–1886), and the first Lithuanian physics textbook of P. Vileišis “Populiariszkas rankvedis fyzikos” (1899) appeared; 2) the beginning of the 20th c – the middle of the 20th c, when the terminology of this stage was influenced by Ig. Končius’ manuscript of physics textbook for gymnasia, during preparation of which he consulted with K. Būga and J. Jablonskis in 1916–1919, Ig. Končius’ dictionary “Terminai fizikos reikalams”, published in Lithuania (1923–1924), K. Šakenis’ “Fizika” (1920), V. Čepinskis’ “Fizikos paskaitos” (1923–1926); 3) the middle of the 20th c – the beginning of the 21st c, when the majority of physical terms, which are still in use, were fixed. P. Brazdžiūnas’ normative work, which was performed by preparing the textbook for higher schools and colleges “Bendroji fizika” (1960–1965) and preparing and editing with his colleagues FTŽ1, FTŽ2, which became the basis of the newest FTŽ3, had influenced it. FTŽ3 terms are standardized most strongly of all terminographic physical publications. It was influenced by the normative aspect of previous dictionaries of physical terms, which changed at the same time, because the conceptions of different notions and terms changed, there were a lot of fixed terms. Consequently, it can be concluded that present physical terminology is standardized fair enough, it corresponds to possible ideal cases of nomination, when a term names only one concept, and the concept corresponds to one term.
Authors and Affiliations
Angelė Kaulakienė
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP84464
- DOI 10.3846/1822-430X.2009.17.2.17-2
- Views 98
- Downloads 0
The Chinese Understanding of Cultural Industries
Cultural industries in China always receive much support from governments and are developing quite fast. This paper will explain the concept of cultural industries in China and show the history of China’s Cultural Indust...
Tarpkūniškumas
Straipsnis atskleidžia fenomenologinę tarpsubjektyvumo problematiką kūno sąveikos su pasauliu ir su kitais subjektais lygmeniu. Vizualumo samprata kinta ir tampa paremta kūno pirmenybe „aš galiu“ bei kinestetine patirtim...
Husserl and the Fact of Practical Reason – Phenomenological Claims toward a Philosophical Ethics
The thesis of this paper is that Husserl, in his later ethics, reinterprets the philosophical content that discloses itself in the Kantian conception of a “fact of practical reason”. From 1917/18 on, Husserl increasingly...
Eurotermbank – naujųjų ES narių terminų bankas
2005-2006 metais vyko Europos Komisijos projektas EuroTermBank (Europos terminologijos išteklių rinkimas, bendradarbiaujant terminologijos institucijoms), kurio metu buvo sukurtas terminų bankas internete EuroTermBank. S...
The Principles of Higher Education
The article investigates the fundamental and derivative principles of academic education on which system of academic education is based. The content of the principles of democracy, dynamism and integration is explicated...