The Thomistic Perception of the Person and Human Rights

Journal Title: Studia Gilsoniana - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 1

Abstract

The idea of human rights is connected to the modern perception of law founded on subjectivity, in the context of which rights are authorizations of individual action versus a higher authority, resulting in a subjectivity of law. The huge importance of the thomistic perception of the person is connected with the issue of relations between the individual and society, as well as relations between law and state, since Thomas Aquinas foresaw what we call ‘rights of man’. Thus, the person, in a metaphysical context, is associated with natural order, since natural sociability forms the basis of a person’s supernatural fulfillment. Because of his social nature, the person is also a carrier of social relations and a product of his own encounter with other persons. In this way, Thomas Aquinas makes a synthesis of man per se, as part of mankind, and man as a person vis-à-vis others in the sphere of justice, consisting ‘in rendering to each one his right’. Ius is a relation of justice concerning what is right (iustum) from the point of view of the other, “to whom something is due.” Aquinas can be considered a forerunner of human rights of the modern era, as demonstrated by the issue of natural equity, the issue of unjust law and obedience and the issue of political legitimization. In this framework, “human” or “natural” rights are considered moral rights. However, in the sphere of law they are perceived only within the community and common good, by no means constituting exclusive and absolute rights but only rights corresponding with duties and obligations. The Thomistic approach expresses both the free side of man vis-à-vis the state and its structures (in the spiritual level) and the egalitarian demand of law within social relations. Furthermore, it places the sphere of law on the background of common good and common interest. The Thomistic approach of the human person is a response to the modern perception of legal subjectivity and the priority of individuals, associated with the ideology of rights and leading to a confrontation of individual and society and a division of man to natural man and citizen, a product of the antithesis between society and state.

Authors and Affiliations

Eleni Procopiou

Keywords

Related Articles

Thomas Aquinas on Bodily Identity by Antonia Fitzpatrick

Antonia Fitzpatrick argues clearly throughout Thomas Aquinas on Bodily Identity that the Dominican saint never consistently achieves a coherent, unified understanding of the nature of the continuity of bod-ily matter acr...

Silence and the Audibility of the Word: Contemplative Listening as a Fundamental Act of the New Evangelization. Part 3: Christ Reveals Man to Himself on Calvary

In the third part of her arguing for contemplative listening as a fundamental act of the new evangelization, the author shows that the concrete place where the anthropological and theological dimensions of listening conv...

Thirdness along the Intuitional Path: Reflections from Maritain and Peirce

This article exposits Maritain’s and Peirce’s account of the preconditions for emergence of event relations. It spotlights Maritain’s model of how to prepare for the receipt of objective intellection, as well as Peirce’s...

PERSONALISM IN THE LUBLIN SCHOOL OF PHILOSOPHY (CARD. KAROL WOJTYŁA, FR. MIECZYSŁAW A. KRĄPIEC)

The article presents the conception of personalism and the understanding of human person developed by two Polish philosophers: Karol Wojtyła and Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, the framers and the main representatives of the Lubl...

Psychic Wholeness and Healing by Anna A. Terruwe and Conrad W. Baars

This paper is a review of the book: Anna A. Terruwe and Conrad W. Baars, Psychic Wholeness and Healing (Eugene, Oreg.: Wipf and Stock, 2016, 2nd edition). According to the author, the book shows (1) how Thomistic thought...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP252285
  • DOI -
  • Views 194
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Eleni Procopiou (2017). The Thomistic Perception of the Person and Human Rights. Studia Gilsoniana, 6(1), 131-152. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-252285