The use of genetically modified Roundup Ready soyabean meal and genetically modified MON 810 maize in broiler chicken diets. Part 1. Effects on performance and blood lymphocyte subpopulations

Journal Title: Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences - Year 2015, Vol 24, Issue 2

Abstract

The effects of genetically modified (GM) soyabean meal (SBM) and GM maize (MON 810) on the performance and immunological response of broiler chickens were studied. Eight diets were prepared based on conventional or GM SBM (GTS 40-3-2) combined with non-modified maize cvs. Clarica or PR39 F58 or their isogenic GM counterparts, cvs. Bacilla or PR39 F56. Diets were fed in mash form from day one of age to 192 Ross 308 broiler females, allocated to 8 groups, 24 birds per group. From day 8 to 28 of age, 18 chickens per group were kept in individual cages and performance parameters were measured. After slaughter the shares of T helper and T cytotoxic cells in the blood were determined in 8 birds per group. The feed conversion ratio (FCR) of birds fed GM SBM was better by 3.2% than in birds fed conventional SBM (P < 0.01). The performance of birds fed GM maize did not differ from those fed conventional maize, but body weight gain was lower and FCR worse by 3.3% in birds fed diets with Clarica/Bacilla compared with the PR 39 cultivar. The shares of circulating lymphocytes in their entire population averaged 10% to 17% and 6.5 to 12.2% (T helper and T cytotoxic, respectively) for all groups except the group fed conventional cv. Clarica maize and non-modified SBM (31% and 20.6%, respectively). It may be concluded that the use of GM GTS 40-3-2 soyabean meal and GM MON 810 maize in broiler diets did not negatively affect the feed efficiency and blood lymphocyte subpopulations of broilers.

Authors and Affiliations

J. Czerwiński, M. Bogacki, B. M. Jalali, P. Konieczka, S. Smulikowska

Keywords

Related Articles

The effect of conjugated linoleic acid isomers, selenite and selenized yeast supplemented to the diet on the fatty acid profile in the pancreas of rats

The influence of dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers (CLAmix) and/or Se as Na2 SeO3 (SeIV) or selenized yeast (SeY) on the relative body weight gain (RBWG) of rats, pancreas weight, concentrations of CLA isome...

The role of animal feeding trials for the nutritional and safety assessment of feeds from genetically modified plants – Present stage and future challenges

The world´s population is still growing up and asking for more and better food. High yielding plants with low external inputs should be the main aim of plant breeding to meet the higher demand for man and animal. Apart f...

The effect of genetically modified maize (MON 810) and soyabean meal (Roundup Ready) on rearing performance and transfer of transgenic DNA to calf tissues

The experiment was performed to determine whether genetically modified maize (MON 810) and soyabean meal (Roundup Ready, MON 40-3-2) used as the main source of feed in a concentrate can affect the performance parameters,...

The effects of different processing methods on the estimated nutritional value of rice bran according to the NRC-2001 Model5 or DVE/OEB System

Four dairy cows fitted with ruminal and T-shaped duodenal cannulas were used to investigate the effects of processing methods on the nutritional value of rice bran and to compare the potential nutrient supply according t...

Entropy analysis of performance test results of warmblood stallions

The objective of the present study was to evaluate relationships among recorded traits in a 100-day stationary performance test in warmblood stallions in Poland. The possibility of reducing the number of recorded traits...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP75408
  • DOI -
  • Views 98
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

J. Czerwiński, M. Bogacki, B. M. Jalali, P. Konieczka, S. Smulikowska (2015). The use of genetically modified Roundup Ready soyabean meal and genetically modified MON 810 maize in broiler chicken diets. Part 1. Effects on performance and blood lymphocyte subpopulations. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 24(2), 134-143. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-75408