Understanding the Self Biologically
Journal Title: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy - Year 2014, Vol 11, Issue 0
Abstract
In Total Recall the hero discovers that his good-guy self is just implanted memories. His body used to be occupied by another, vicious self, whose allies want back. This fantasy gains some plausibility from the traditional conception of the self as a collection of experiences kept in memory — a unified conscious self that makes our experiences feel ours. Great fiction, bad neuroscience. There is no central brain structure that corresponds to that self, and some scientists have concluded that the self is an illusion. The notion that the self tags our experiences as ours seems to be wrong. And the idea that the self is a collection of remembered experiences turns out to be false. We propose instead a revolutionary biological conception of the self: The brain has evolved to constitute a self that is mostly unconscious and distributive, which does away with the paradoxes, explains all the seemingly contradictory experimental results, and opens up new avenues of research in neuroscience.
Authors and Affiliations
Yi Zheng, Gonzalo Munévar
Historical Science, Experimental Science, and the Scientific Method
Many scientists believe that there is a uniform, interdisciplinary method for the practice of good science. The paradigmatic examples, however, are drawn from classical experimental science. Insofar as historical hypothe...
Postscript (2015)
Debata Benedykta XVI i jego uczniów nad stworzeniem i ewolucją
Artykuł prezentuje komentarze i opinie na temat spotkania Benedykta XVI ze swoimi dawnymi uczniami, które miało miejsce 1-3 września 2006 roku w Castel Gandolfo. Na spotkaniu dyskutowano o stosunku Kościoła katolickiego...
The Pretense of Doing Philosophy
Review of: Wojciech Grygiel, Stephena Hawkinga i Rogera Penrose’a spór o rzeczywistość, Copernicus Center Press, Kraków 2014, pp. 412.
Projekt? Tak! Ale czy inteligentny?
Autor porusza różne tematy związane z teorią inteligentnego projektu. Przedmiotem jego rozważań są: naukowa wartość teorii inteligentnego projektu; rozróżnienie naturalizmu metafizycznego od naturalizmu metodologicznego...