Welfare effects of nudges: The emotional tax of calorie menu labeling

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2019, Vol 14, Issue 1

Abstract

Traditionally, information has been assumed to never harm consumers, a notion recently challenged. Salience nudges have been argued to evoke negative emotions, therefore acting as “emotional taxes”. I design a hypothetical restaurant meal experiment to analyze the emotional and short-term consumer welfare impact of a calorie salience nudge (calorie menu labeling) – a policy implemented nationwide in the U.S. in 2018. I find that a calorie salience nudge may act as an emotional tax, but only for some – there is considerable heterogeneity in the emotional response to the nudge. In particular, the nudge emotionally taxes people with low eating self-control, while it emotionally subsidizes those with higher levels of eating self-control. It therefore emotionally taxes the “right” people. However, people with lower levels of self-control may experience fewer benefits from the nudge – the nudge causes them to adjust their high calorie meal consumption by less than do those with higher self-control. It is therefore unsurprising that consumers with lower self-control attach a lower (a negative) value to the calorie salience nudge. Overall, the calorie salience nudge positively affects consumer welfare, although heterogeneity over consumers is substantial – the consumer value ranges from positive to negative. I find no distributional effects over income from the calorie salience nudge.

Authors and Affiliations

Linda Thunström

Keywords

Related Articles

The average laboratory samples a population of 7,300 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers

Using capture-recapture analysis we estimate the effective size of the active Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) population that a typical laboratory can access to be about 7,300 workers. We also estimate that the time taken...

Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment

We designed an experiment to test the robustness of Dana, Weber, and Kuang’s (DWK), 2007 results. DWK observed that, when participants were given a “costless” way — the click of a button — to ignore the consequences of t...

Emotional tone and argumentation in risk communication

In this paper I explore how the evolution of emotional expression and co-operative planning in humans may inform the way they communicate about risks, and what implication this may have for models of rationality in risk...

Forecasting forecasts: The trend effect

People often make predictions about the future based on trends they have observed in the past. Revised probabilistic forecasts can be perceived by the public as indicative of such a trend. In five studies, we describe ex...

Think or blink — is the recognition heuristic an “intuitive” strategy?

Several approaches to judgment and decision making emphasize the effort-reducing properties of heuristics. One prominent example for effort-reduction is the recognition heuristic (RH) which proposes that judgments are ma...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678393
  • DOI -
  • Views 180
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Linda Thunström (2019). Welfare effects of nudges: The emotional tax of calorie menu labeling. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678393