Wertapriori und Wertsein in der materialen Wertethik Max Schelers

Abstract

Scheler called “material ethics of value” his own phenomenological ethics. Therefore, to clarify the concept of “value” is the most important step for a good understanding of his phenomenological material ethics of value. In the whole framework of the phenomenological movement, many phenomeno-ogists such as Husserl, Scheler, and N. Hartmann and so on developed their own ethics of value. But we can see the fundamental difference between Husserl’s or Hartmann’s ethics of value and Scheler’s one. The reason for this is that they prescribed “value” differently. In Scheler’s phenomenological material ethics of value, there are two basic formulations of value: the former is the value a priori as material a priori (more exactly, the relevant priori feeling), and the latter, the value being as a ultimately basic form of being (such a value-being is as basic as Dasein and Sosein, and by it, Scheler refuted Heidegger’s question on value being in advance). On the one hand, in contrast with Husserl, Scheler regarded value a priori as primal-phenomenon; On the other hand, unlike N. Hartmann, Scheler prescribed value-being as “the relative being of act”. In this sense, Scheler’s phenomenological material ethics of value is founded neither merely on the value a priori in the sense of thing-phenomenology, nor merely on emotional a priori in the sense of the act-phenomenology, but on a “material apriorism”. There are three kinds of a priori in such a “material apriorism”: value a priori, emotional a priori and the relevant a priori between fact and act.

Authors and Affiliations

Wei Zhang

Keywords

Related Articles

The three types of perception and the concept of image in Bergson

The article focuses on the constitution of the concept of image in Bergson’s second important book, Matter and Memory. It intends to show how this concept is developing throughout the three types of perception that can b...

La douleur comme « matrice » de la vie intérieure chez Nietzsche

This paper attempts to put some order among the different notions of pain that are to be found in the Nietzschean philosophical corpus. It tries to show that there is a mutation of the Nietzschean concept of pain, from t...

Performativity and Heidegger’s Hermeneutics of Facticity

For a compatibility of Heideggers Contributions with today's questions of meaning and performative processes of self-interpretation, Rüdiger Rimpler recently suggested to draw on studies from the field of performativity...

Baudrillard et la logique sociale de la consommation

This paper is a fragmented exploration of Jean Baudrillard’s theory of consumption, one that belongs to his early writings. Even though they became commonplaces inside the analysis of contemporary society, themes such as...

La rationalité aux limites et les limites de la rationalité : la question de l’intégrité et de l’existence de l’espèce humaine

The purpose of this article is to address the question of our responsibility as human beings, by taking into consideration the intersection between ethics and science. I intend to prove that the issues raised by the exis...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP113309
  • DOI -
  • Views 102
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Wei Zhang (2010). Wertapriori und Wertsein in der materialen Wertethik Max Schelers. Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy, 2(1), 178-194. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-113309