Who throws good money after bad? Action vs. state orientation moderates the sunk cost fallacy

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2010, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

The sunk cost fallacy is the tendency to continue an endeavour once an investment in money, effort, or time has been made. We studied how people’s chronic orientation to cope with failing projects (i.e., action vs. state orientation) influences the occurrence of this sunk cost effect. We found that people with a state orientation, who have a tendency to ruminate about past events and have a hard time to let go of them, were especially prone to fall in the sunk cost trap. People with an action orientation, who more easily let go of past events, were not susceptible to the sunk cost effect. We discuss the implications of these results for the sunk cost fallacy literature.

Authors and Affiliations

Marijke van Putten, Marcel Zeelenberg and Eric van Dijk

Keywords

Related Articles

Disentangling the effects of alternation rate and maximum run length on judgments of randomness

Binary sequences are characterized by various features. Two of these characteristics—alternation rate and run length—have repeatedly been shown to influence judgments of randomness. The two characteristics, however, have...

Can asymmetric subjective opportunity cost effect explain impatience in intertemporal choice? A replication study

In “The value of nothing: asymmetric attention to opportunity costs drives intertemporal decision making” Read, Olivola and Hardisty (2017) proposed an asymmetric subjective opportunity cost (ASOC) effect to explain and...

Contamination, association, or social communication: An examination of alternative accounts for contagion effects

Individuals avoid objects that have been in physical contact with morally offensive or disgusting entities. This has been called negative magical contagion, an implicit belief in the transmission of essence by physical c...

Reconciling pro-social vs. selfish behavior: On the role of self-control

We test in the context of a dictator game the proposition that individuals may experience a self-control conflict between the temptation to act selfishly and the better judgment to act pro-socially. We manipulated the li...

Intuition speed as a predictor of choice and confidence in point spread predictions

Previous research has revealed that intuitive confidence is an important predictor of how people choose between an intuitive and non-intuitive alternative when faced with information that opposes the intuitive response....

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677719
  • DOI -
  • Views 138
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Marijke van Putten, Marcel Zeelenberg and Eric van Dijk (2010). Who throws good money after bad? Action vs. state orientation moderates the sunk cost fallacy. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677719