Wronging past rights: The sunk cost bias distorts moral judgment
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2019, Vol 14, Issue 6
Abstract
When people have invested resources into an endeavor, they typically persist in it, even when it becomes obvious that it will fail. Here we show this bias extends to people’s moral decision-making. Across two preregistered experiments (N = 1592) we show that people are more willing to proceed with a futile, immoral action when costs have been sunk (Experiment 1A and 1B). Moreover, we show that sunk costs distort people’s perception of morality by increasing how acceptable they find actions that have received past investment (Experiment 2). We find these results in contexts where continuing would lead to no obvious benefit and only further harm. We also find initial evidence that the bias has a larger impact on judgment in immoral compared to non-moral contexts. Our findings illustrate a novel way that the past can affect moral judgment. Implications for rational moral judgment and models of moral cognition are discussed.
Authors and Affiliations
Ethan A. Meyers, Michał Białek, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Derek J. Koehler and Ori Friedman
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678452
- DOI -
- Views 158
- Downloads 0
Myopic loss aversion: Potential causes of replication failures
This paper presents two studies on narrow bracketing and myopic loss aversion. The first study shows that the tendency to segregate multiple gambles is eliminated if subjects face a certainty equivalent or a probability...
A direct and comprehensive test of two postulates of politeness theory applied to uncertainty communication
Applied to uncertainty communication, politeness theory postulates that when announcing bad news (1) speakers may intend not only to inform, but also to manage (e.g., save) the hearers’ or speakers’ own faces (i.e., face...
Biases in choices about fairness: Psychology and economic inequality
This paper investigates choices about “distributional fairness” (sometimes called “distributive justice”), i.e., selection of the proper way for resources to be distributed in group. The study finds evidence that several...
From group diffusion to ratio bias: Effects of denominator and numerator salience on intuitive risk and likelihood judgments
The group-diffusion effect is the tendency for people to judge themselves to be less likely to experience a negative outcome as the total number of people exposed to the threat increases — even when the probability of th...
Bayesian methods for analyzing true-and-error models
Birnbaum and Quispe-Torreblanca (2018) evaluated a set of six models developed under true-and-error theory against data in which people made choices in repeated gambles. They concluded the three models based on expected...