„Wszystko, co powiesz, może być użyte przeciwko Tobie”, czyli o odpowiedzialności etycznej filozofów za słowo pisane
Journal Title: Amor Fati - Year 2016, Vol 2, Issue 2
Abstract
Providing the problems with the exegesis of the philosophers thought, the author tries to recognize the reasons of this situation. She contemplates both the purposeful beclouding as well as the impossibility of giving the precise expression of the object of cognition. The author indicates, that when the reader meets the article, the latter stops being the author`s own belonging, which gives rise to the matter of responsibility for the author`s words. It is of the utmost importance when the possible interpretations considers the authority and the historical context of re-reading of the philosophy text.
Authors and Affiliations
Joanna Janicka
Czy rzeczywistość posiada strukturę? Część II: Realizm i hierarchizm ontologiczny
-
Nie tylko technika – ekspresja konstrukcji jako estetyczny walor dzieła architektonicznego
The article raises the problem of aesthetic role of construction in the architectural object. The building’s structure can fulfill its task not only as a technical element – bearing particular load – but it can also be a...
Outsider czy zwierzę? Rozważania nad „zwierzęcością” Meursaulta – bohatera Obcego Alberta Camusa
The purpose of this paper is an attempt to answer the question: how the interpretation of the main hero of "The Stranger"’s Albert Camus as “an animal in human skin” can be applied to understanding the actions of the her...
O stwarzaniu siebie na nowo O zmianie tożsamości w działaniach współczesnych artystów
There are so many definitions of identity. It’s very difficult to find an all-embracing (or universal) definition of identity in psychology, philosophy or even sociology. The author tries to recognize the reasons of this...
Kategoria felicitas w świetle twórczości polskich kompozytorek
-