A Comparative study of I-gel for general anesthesia in obese and non-obese patients at tertiary health care centre

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2019, Vol 9, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: The I-gel supraglottic airway device (Intersurgical Ltd, Wokingham, Berkshire, UK) was developed in 2007 to overcome the limitations of Proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) Aims and Objectives: To study I-gel for general anesthesia in obese and non-obese patients at tertiary health care centre. Methodology: This was cross-sectional study carried out in the department of anesthesiology the one year period during January 2017 to January 2018; in one year period there were 30 non obese individuals and 30 obese individuals were enrolled to study after a written explained consent. All the patients undergone i-gel insertion for General anesthesia. OLP in the patients was measured by closing the adjustable pressure limiting valve of the circle breathing system and noting the pressure at which leak developed (detected by a stethoscope placed just lateral to thyroid cartilage) at fresh gas flow of 3 L/min. The statistical analysis was done by chi-square test and analyzed by SPSS 19 version software. Result: In our study we have seen that The parameters were comparable with each other especially like OLP (CM of H2O )- 26.78 ±3.92 And 28.45 ± 4.56 (p>0.05); LF - 7.91 ± 3.45 and 8.98 ± 3.54 (p>0.05); Time to insert i-gel (s) 15.45 ± 5.86 and 18.1 ± 4.56 (p>0.05) . The grade of ease of insertion was more in Obese individuals was more as compared to non-obese individuals this was statistically significant (X2=7.36,df=2,p<0.02) .The no. of attempts were more in Obese individuals as compared to non obese individuals this was statistically significant (X2=6.955,df=2,p<0.03) Conclusion: It can be concluded from our study that i-gel insertion was comparable with obese and non-obese individuals except to ease of insertion and no. of attempts required more .

Authors and Affiliations

Dantoor Suresh, Nunavath Surya

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative assessment of side effects of etomidate and propofol: A double blinded study from urban Karnataka

Background: Propofol and Etomidate is commonly used in anaesthesia practice. However pain on injection and myoclonus are the most common side effects of this drug. Objectives: To compare the side effects between Etomidat...

Effect of Rocuronium and Succinylcholine on intraocular pressure during intubation: An institution based comparative study

Background: Anaesthetic management plays a very vital role in the successful outcome of surgeries anywhere, and the eye is no exception. Because of the comparatively small area of surgical field, and the anatomical isola...

A study of the efficacy of paravertebral block in the patients of breast surgeries at tertiary health care centre

Background: Breast cancer is perhaps the most common cancer in women that requires frequent surgical intervention. Until recently breast surgeries were typically performed under general anaesthesia by intravenous and inh...

Study of post-operative analgesia after addition of opioids with intravenous regional anesthesia

Background: Intravenous regional anesthesia was first discovered by August Carl Gustav Bier. In 1908 came the first Bier’s paper in “Venous Anesthesia” which was natural outgrowth of his previous work with tourniquet and...

Evaluation of intubating conditions using dexmedetomidine - fentanyl combination versus dexmedetomidine alone for awake nasal fiberoptic intubation

Aims and Objective: Awake fiberoptic intubation is one of the principal techniques of intubation in patients with difficult airway. The aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine- Fentanyl combi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP440075
  • DOI 10.26611/1015911
  • Views 185
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dantoor Suresh, Nunavath Surya (2019). A Comparative study of I-gel for general anesthesia in obese and non-obese patients at tertiary health care centre. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 9(1), 1-3. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-440075