Assessment of Spinal Canal Diameters for Clinically Suspected Cases of Lumbar Canal Stenosis on MRI

Journal Title: IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) - Year 2019, Vol 18, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: Lumbar canal stenosis means reduced space available for the neural and vascular elements in the lumbar spine leading to low backache or lower extremity pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the key non-invasive test for assessment of lumbar canal stenosis. Studies have been performed to develop the criteria for spinal stenosis in the lumbar spine. However, till date no consensus on quantitative criteria has been made. Imaging with MRI, in our study, can help in formulating a cause and critical quantitative criteria for stenosis that can provide evidence-based recommendations for proper evaluation needed for optimum treatment of clinically suspected patients. Materials and methods: A total of 100 symptomatic cases who were suspected of lumbar canal stenosis, aged between 30 to 60 years, and 30 age matched asymptomatic controls underwent MRI of the lumbar spine. Patients were assessed for stenosis on the basis of six qualitative criteria, as given after the result of a Delphi survey in 2012. Various quantitative parameters were then measured at five levels (L1 to L5) and compared with the controls. Results: The narrowest mid sagittal anteroposterior spinal canal diameter at body (mean 13.9 mm) and at disc (mean 12.2 mm) level were seen at L4 level and L5-S1 level respectively while narrowest thecal sac diameters at body (mean 11.2 mm) and at disc (mean 8.9 mm) levels were seen at L5 level and L4-L5 level respectively. The cut off limits for spinal canal stenosis were given for spinal canal diameter at body, thecal sac diameter at body, spinal canal diameter at disc and thecal sac diameter at disc as 13.5 cm, 10.5 cm, 13.5 cm and 7.5 cm respectively. Conclusion: It was concluded that the thecal sac diameter at disc level with a critical value of 7.5 mm had highest sensitivity (87%) and specificity (84%) as far as canal stenosis was concerned and should be given highest priority while taking the measurements.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Pawan Soni, Dr. Dinesh Sood, Dr. Ira Jamwal, Dr. Rajeev Kapila

Keywords

Related Articles

Cytological evaluation of false negative rate in thyroid: an institutional experience

Background: FNAC is a simple, safe, cost effective diagnostic procedure that provides rapid diagnosis in evaluation of thyroid lesions. Aim: The aim of this study was to analyse false negatives and false positives in pal...

Comparison of near patient fine needle aspiration cytology with rapid on side evaluation V/S fine needle aspiration done by other specialists

Introduction:- FNAC procedure looks very easy parse, but it is highly tactic & require special training. Object:- The study is done to evaluate the efficacy of FNAC done by other specialist vs near patient FNAC & ROSE(ra...

Hyalinised Oncocytoma of Parotid Gland: A Case Report

Oncocytoma or oxyphilic adenoma is defined since the classic works of Hamperl as a benign tumor exclusively composed of oxyphilic cells ; the large eosinophilic cuboidal to columnar cells with more than 60% of their cyto...

Assessment of sCD36 levels and Lipids in Type II Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Cluster determinant 36 (CD36) is a fatty acid translocase which is expressed in variety of cells. Increased expression of CD36 is observed in liver, adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. Non-cell bound CD36 was...

Screening of Lactate dehydrogenasein ascitic/pleural fluid in Saraswathi institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur

Introduction: Aims To investigate lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) measurements in fluids.These are more sensitive and specific markers for differentiating between exudates and transudates, as confirmed clinically, than the m...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP431031
  • DOI 10.9790/0853-1801037885.
  • Views 28
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Pawan Soni, Dr. Dinesh Sood, Dr. Ira Jamwal, Dr. Rajeev Kapila (2019). Assessment of Spinal Canal Diameters for Clinically Suspected Cases of Lumbar Canal Stenosis on MRI. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS), 18(1), 78-85. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-431031