Bike fitting: finding an optimum between performance and overuse injuries prevention? Influence of saddle fore-aft position on pedalling effectiveness
Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2016, Vol 5, Issue 2
Abstract
There exists a great range of possibilities offered to cyclists to adjust their equipment. The influence of some bike adjustments as well as the interactions between them on the performance and/or the biomechanics of pedalling has been extensively studied but the setup of an optimal saddle setback remains controversial. Saddle setback is commonly associated with KOPS - Knee Over the Pedal Spindle - that means that saddle setback should allow the inferior pole of the patella to be at the vertical of the pedal spindle when the pedal is at 3 o'clock. However the rationale for this is unclear even if a few opinion articles suggested that exceeding this location may engender patellofemoral pain syndrome. According to UCI regulations, the horizontal distance between the chainset centre and the anterior portion of the saddle shall be a minimum of 5 cm, no maximum is recommended and, again, with no scientific support provided. Furthermore, this rule does not take the cyclist’s anthropometry into account and other disciplines such as track cycling or triathlon are not subject to this regulation, permitting a smaller setback. From a performance point of view, it is known that sitting more forward allows for an increase in maximal power production but the evidence relating saddle setback to pedalling effectiveness at steady state remains inconclusive.
Authors and Affiliations
M Domalain| Institut Pprime, CNRS, Université de Poitiers, ISAE-ENSMA, F-86962 Futuroscope Chasseneuil, France, M Ménard| Institut Pprime, CNRS, Université de Poitiers, ISAE-ENSMA, F-86962 Futuroscope Chasseneuil, France, A Decatoire| Institut Pprime, CNRS, Université de Poitiers, ISAE-ENSMA, F-86962 Futuroscope Chasseneuil, France, P Lacouture| Institut Pprime, CNRS, Université de Poitiers, ISAE-ENSMA, F-86962 Futuroscope Chasseneuil, France
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP2965
- DOI -
- Views 437
- Downloads 45
Analysis of Mean Maximal Power in cycling with a modified Critical Power model allowing for a non-constant Anaerobic Work Capacity
Introduction: Since its introduction by Monod and Sherrer1 the Critical Power model has been applied to the analysis of cycling performances. In this model the Critical Power CP is the highest power that can be sustained...
The reliability and validity of the 3-minute critical power test
Background: Athletes utilise exercise testing to assist with training design and race strategy. Critical power (CP) is a useful addition to an exercise testing battery as it provides an estimate of the heavy-severe exerc...
The head movements degrade the aerodynamic drag according to the time-trial duration
Effective frontal area (ACd, m2) is the main parameter opposing motion on level ground in cycling (Debraux et al. 2011). To reduce ACd, cyclists adopt a characteristic time trial (TT) position accounting for about 70 %...
The effect of beetroot juice dosage on high intensity intermittent cycling performance
Background: Resynthesis of creatine phosphate (PCr) and intramuscular pH, which influences glycolytic rate, are dependent on skeletal muscle blood flow (Sahlin et al., 1979: Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laborator...
Comparison of power output demands for a top-10 ranking between Tour de France and Vuelta a España
Background: Grand Tours (GT) are extreme endurance cycling events with about 3500 km covered in twenty-one stages during three weeks. Using the heart rate measurement, Lucia et al. (Lucia et al., 2003: Medicine & Science...