Differences in visual information-seeking behavior between expert and novice time-trial cyclists
Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2015, Vol 4, Issue 2
Abstract
Introduction: Pacing can be defined as an ability to distribute available energy resources during the race (Hettinga et al., 2006). It’s a determinant of athletic performance, affected by an interaction between previous experience, performance feedback and individual risk-traits (Micklewright et al., 2014). Selective processing of internal physiological and external feedback information is a complex process that informs pace decision-making (Renfree et al., 2014), but little is known about how athletes seek-out and interpret information to make pacing decisions. This study compared information-seeking behavior between novice and experienced cyclists. Methods: Novice (n=10) and experienced (n=10) cyclists performed two 16.09 km self-paced time-trials (TT’s), one week apart. Time-trials were performed on a Velotron cycle ergometer using a video simulated course. Performance information (power, speed, cadence, distance and time), heart rate and the 6-20 RPE scale were displayed in front of participants during TT’s. A head-mounted eye-tracker was used to measure the frequency and duration of gazes towards each type of information. Gaze was coded as ‘other’ when participants were not looking at any of the information specified above. Cumulative gaze duration for each information source was calculated as a percentage of TT completion time. Between and within-subjects ANOVA’s were used to compare performance, fixation times and fixation frequencies between groups and trials. Results: Performance between TT’s did not change for experts (27:55±1:21 vs. 27:42±1:30 mins:secs) or novices (30:53±3:14 vs. 30:16±2:56 mins:secs). Cycling speed in each segment was faster among experts compared to novices, but both groups maintained an even pace through the TT’s. In TT1, experts primarily looked at speed (30.1%) followed by other (19.3%) then distance (18.3%). Novices were less selective during TT1, looking at distance (21.6%), video (15.3%), other (14.3%), and power (13.4%) (Fig 1A). Experts looked at speed more in TT2 (Speed 33.4%, Distance 17.7%, and other 16%) and novices looked at the video less (Distance 23.1%, Speed 14.4%, Power 13.8%, Other 13.6% and Video 10.5%) (Fig1B). Differences in fixation time were found between groups for primary (P=0.003) and secondary sources of information (P=0.043) (Fig 2A). Differences were also found in frequency for primary (P=0.003) and secondary source of information (P=0.04) respectively (Fig. 2B). Discussion: Experts were found to look at speed as their primary source of information compared to novices who looked at distance. This may indicate a preference for performance related decision-making in experts compared to a focus on task completion among novices.
Authors and Affiliations
Boya M| Sport, Performance & Fatigue Research Unit, University of Essex, Foulsham T| Sport, Performance & Fatigue Research Unit, University of Essex, Hettinga, F| Sport, Performance & Fatigue Research Unit, University of Essex, Parry D| Sport, Performance & Fatigue Research Unit, University of Essex, Williams EL| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Jones HS| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Sparks SA| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Marchant D| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Ellison P| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Bridge C| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Midgley A| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, McNaughton L| Sport Performance Group, Edge Hill University, Micklewright D. | Sport, Performance & Fatigue Research Unit, University of Essex
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP2931
- DOI -
- Views 386
- Downloads 21
Muscular fatigue of the lower limb and subsequent joint angle adaptations during a 16.1km cycling time trial
Background: Effective muscular recruitment during cycling is crucial to optimising performance. As such, much research has examined when muscles are active during the pedal revolution and how muscle co-activation may in...
The effects of forward rotation of posture on heavy intensity cycling: Implications of UCI rule 1.3.013
UCI rule 1.3.013 limits the forward displacement of the nose of the saddle to 5cm rearward of the centre of the bottom-bracket. This study tests the effects of contravening this rule on 4km laboratory time trials and hig...
Vibration exposure on cobbles sectors during ParisRoubaix
Paris-Roubaix is a unique and singular race of UCI World Tour. Compared to other “classic races”, the difficulty of the route is increased by the mechanical vibrations encountered during many cobbles sectors. These ones...
Agreement Between the Stages Cycling and SRM Powermeter Systems during Field- Based Off-Road Climbing
The aim of this study was to determine the agreement between two portable cycling powermeters for use doing field based mountain biking. A single participant performed 15 timed ascents of an off-road climbs. The particip...
Physiological and performance characteristics of road, mountain bike and BMX cyclists
The purpose of this research was to quantify several physiological and power output characteristics of high-performance road, cross-country mountain bike (XCMB), downhill mountain bike (DHMB) and bicycle motocross (BMX)...