The effects of forward rotation of posture on heavy intensity cycling: Implications of UCI rule 1.3.013
Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2015, Vol 4, Issue 3
Abstract
UCI rule 1.3.013 limits the forward displacement of the nose of the saddle to 5cm rearward of the centre of the bottom-bracket. This study tests the effects of contravening this rule on 4km laboratory time trials and highlights biomechanical and physiological responses that could be of interest to coaches and bike fitters. Ten competitive male cyclists age 26±2 (mean±SD) yrs, height 180±5 cm, body mass 71±6 kg; V̇ O2max 70.9±8.6 ml·kg-1·min-1) completed 4km time trials and heavy intensity bouts. Riding posture was rotated forward where the nose of the saddle was 0, 2, 4, and 6cm to the rear of the bottom bracket (P0, P2, P4 and P6). End time, power, cardiorespiratory responses, lower appendage kinematics and crank torque kinetics were measured. There was no significant effect of position on 4 km time trials completion time or power. During 4 km time trials and heavy intensity bouts, gas exchange variables and lower limb range of motion were unchanged (P>0.05). Trunk lean angle, cardiac output and stroke volume were greater at P6 than other positions (P<0.05). Angular velocity of the hip over top dead centre (350-10°) and the hip peak torque angle were greater at P0 than other positions (P<0.05). Peak and mean torque were unchanged (P>0.05). Results indicate, contravening rule 1.3.013 does not bring about improvements to 4km laboratory TTs. The rearward shift in peak crank torque most likely occurs as a function of altered muscle activation. Haemodynamic variations are possibly related to changes in peripheral resistance at the most forward position. Further work is necessary to allude to probable improvements in aerodynamics.
Authors and Affiliations
Oliver Caddy| Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom., Matthew A Timmis| Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom., Dan Gordon| Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP2949
- DOI -
- Views 357
- Downloads 20
Reliability of performance and associated physiological responses during simulated sprint-distance triathlon
Many different methods of simulating triathlon performance in controlled conditions have been developed without establishing the reliability of these assessments. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of...
Reliability and validity of PowerCal power distribution during cycling time trial
The PowerCal device (Cyclops, Madison, USA) is a heart rate (HR) strap that estimates power output (PO) using an algorithm computed from the HR response recorded during exercise. The device is a low-cost method (~ 99 US...
Comparison of physiological and perceptual responses to a maximal exhaustive test performed on the SRM and the Cyclus2 ergometer
Background: No cycle ergometer perfectly replicates the physiological demands and movement patterns associated with real world cycling (Abbiss et al., 2009: International Journal of Sports Medicine, 30(2), 107-112). The...
Individualised training duration induces similar physiological and performance benefits at different intensities
Background: When comparing the effects of different training intensities, studies often standardise for energy expenditure. These studies tend to suggest that high intensity training (HIT) provides greater or similar ben...
Optimisation of cycling training
Introduction: Training is fundamental to improving athletic performance, and progressive training schedules are commonly adopted. However, the quantification and optimisation of a progressive training schedule in order t...