Classification of administrators of public service in judicial power
Journal Title: Naukovyy Visnyk Dnipropetrovs'kogo Derzhavnogo Universytety Vnutrishnikh Sprav - Year 2019, Vol 1, Issue 1
Abstract
The article is devoted to questions of improvement of public service in bodies of judicial power. Attention is not given to a wide range of subjects that are empowered to administer public service in the judiciary. Their classification is carried out and powers are investigated. The court, exercising justice on the principles of the rule of law, ensures everyone the right to a fair trial and respect for other rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine as well as international treaties, the consent of which is binding on the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. In view of the foregoing, a number of issues arise, first of all, with the formation of a professional judge corps, as well as organizational support for the work of the courts themselves: clerical work, organization of court sessions, joint activities with other state authorities. It is clear that the fulfillment of these tasks should be done by officials and specialists who also have to meet certain professional requirements. In view of the recent changes in the issues of passing public service in the judiciary, the emergence of new entities in its management, we consider it relevant and appropriate to highlight issues related to the provision of judicial bodies by the professional body of public servants. It is not possible to disclose this issue, it did not cover the subjects of administration by public service in the judicial authorities, to clarify their system and powers. Taking into account the foregoing it may be noted that in our country there has been a complex and multifunctional system of administration of public service subjects. In our opinion, we propose to classify the system of subjects of administration by public service in judicial bodies as follows: 1) external subjects in relation to the judiciary; 2) specialized public service administration bodies in the judicial authorities; 3) bodies of judicial and public administration by public service in judicial bodies; 4) subjects of administration by public service in each particular court.
Authors and Affiliations
R. Z. Holobutovskyy
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP584529
- DOI 10.31733/2078-3566-2019-1-57-61
- Views 129
- Downloads 0
Features of inspection of crime scene during investigation of pickpocketing
The article describes the features of the inspection of the scene during the investigation of pickpocketing. A set of factors determining the latency of pickpocketing has been determined. It is noted that the main invest...
The Phenomenon of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
The article is devoted to the characterization of the legal nature of Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the impact of its provisions on changing views on the understanding of human rights, the form...
Confiscation and special confiscation as possible consequence of corrupt offense
The article deals with scientific and practical commentary of art. 69 of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption" of October 14, 2014: additional arguments have been presented in favor of the exclusion of propert...
Use of the capabilities of the operational units during the investigation during the scrutiny of the illegal movement of firearms
There is the investigation of the use of the capabilities of the operational units during the investigation during the scrutiny of the illegal movement of firearms. As a result of the analysis of the opinions of scientis...
Legal nature and essence of administrative and legal disputes
The article deals with the definition of the category of administrative-legal dispute through the prism of research of different points of view in the legal doctrine. Thus, an administrative legal dispute is a legal conf...