Comparative Evaluation of Butorphanol Versus Nalbuphine for Postoperative Epidural Analgesia in Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgeries

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: Epidural opioids acting through the spinal cord receptors improve the quality and duration of analgesia along with dose-sparing effect with the local anesthetics. The present study compared the efficacy and safety profile of epiduraly administered butorphanol and nalbuphine combined with ropivacaine. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 adult patients of either sex of American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I and II, aged 18-60 years, undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgeries under combined spinal epidural anaesthesia were enrolled into the study. Patients were randomly divided into three groups of 20 each: 0.2% Ropivacaine (group 1), 0.2% ropivacaine + 2 mg butorphanol (group 2), 0.2% ropivacaine + 10 mg Nalbuphine (group 3). The hemodynamic parameters as well as onset of pain relief and duration of analgesia were noted. Adverse events and sedation scores were also noted. Results: We found that haemodynamics were comparable in all the three groups. Onset of analgesia was earliest in Nalbuphine group (group 3) 1.45±0.51 min) followed by butorphanol group - group 2 (4.45±0.61 min) and maximum in ropivacaine plain group 1(8.30±0.97 min. The duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in group 3 (6.40±0.821 hr) followed by butorphanol group - group 2 (4.45±0.605 hr) and shortest in plain group - group 1 (2.30±0.470 hr). Sedation was observed markedly in butorphanol group. No serious cardio respiratory side effects were observed in any group. Conclusions: Butorphanol and Nalbuphine as epidural adjuvants are equally safe and provide comparable stable hemodynamics, early onset and establishment of sensory anesthesia. Nalbuphine provides a significantly prolonged post-operative analgesia.

Authors and Affiliations

Mukesh Kumar

Keywords

Related Articles

Pain on Propofol Injection: Comparative Study of Pre-Treatment with Intravenous Lignocaine, Ondansetron and Fentanyl for the Prevention of Pain

Context: Propofol is a sedative-hypnotic intravenous anaesthetic agent. It causes a high incidence of pain during intravenous injection which leads to patient dissatisfaction. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine...

A Comparative Study of Hyperbaric Ropivacaine (0.5% in Glucose 5%) with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine (0.5% in Glucose 8%) for Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery

Background: Spinal anaesthesia is well established technique in which several local anaesthetic drugs are used. These drugs have their own advantages and disadvantages regarding safety profile, onset and duration of acti...

Efficacy of Airway Assessment Variables as Predictors of Difficult Intubation among Northeastern Population in India: A Hospital Based Prospective Study

Difficult intubation is an important cause of mortality in surgical patients; even more so when it is unanticipated. Predicting difficult intubation with the help of different airway parameters has been the endeavor of a...

Study of Spinal Anaesthesia in Stable Eclampsia Patients

Introduction: Anaesthesia for caesarean section in patients with eclampsia has always been a task of challenge. Regional anaesthesia has gained popularity in management of such cases in last few years as it avoids the pr...

A Prospective Randomized Study of Percutaneous Tracheostomy versus Surgical Tracheostomy

Aim: Aim of study was to compare Percutaneous Tracheostomy ( PT) and Surgical Tracheostomy (ST) both for complications, duration of procedure ,cost and easy of doing it. Objective of our study was to find out time taken...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP619452
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6219.37
  • Views 95
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mukesh Kumar (2019). Comparative Evaluation of Butorphanol Versus Nalbuphine for Postoperative Epidural Analgesia in Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgeries. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 6(2), 611-618. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-619452