Corpus Areopagiticum dans l’interprétation de saint Thomas d’Aquin
Journal Title: Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy - Year 2011, Vol 3, Issue 1
Abstract
In this article I intend to highlight a fundamental difference that I have seized between Dionysius interpreted by Thomas of Aquinas and the author of Corpus Areopagiticum. In the first stage, I will present the way in which Thomas understands Dionysius as a simple Aristotelian, then the confession of faith of saint Thomas regarding that particular Dionysius from The Acts of Apostles 17, 34, without, however, noticing the fact that Dionysius invokes the Holy Trinity in his texts, a dogma established only in the first Ecumenical Council of Nicaea (325). However, the most obvious issue that radically separates the two thinkers (Dionysius and Thomas) is their way of understanding theology (theologia).
Authors and Affiliations
Florin Crismareanu
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP134656
- DOI -
- Views 127
- Downloads 0
Mission Impossible? Thinking What Must be Thought in Heidegger and Deleuze
In this paper, I discuss and compare the (im)possibility of thinking that which is most worth our thought in Deleuze’s What Is Philosophy? (1994) and Heidegger’s course lectures in What Is Called Thinking? (2004). Both a...
L’autorité éducative à l’épreuve de la démocratisation de la vie scolaire
School is an educational institution designed to socialize future citizens that are Students, to adapt them to the Society to which they belong. But we cannot adapt without forcing. This means that all education, includi...
Introduction. Les paradigmes de la justice
Theories of justice are marred by a permanent state of conflict because they express prejudices whose source lies in the lifeworld. One may regard these theories as interpretations of the concept of justice. Assuming a s...
Cosmodernisme ou le nouvel imaginaire
Christian Moraru, Cosmodernism. American Narrative, Late Globalization, and the new Cultural Imaginary, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2011
Mission Impossible? Thinking What Must be Thought in Heidegger and Deleuze
In this paper, I discuss and compare the (im)possibility of thinking that which is most worth our thought in Deleuze’s What Is Philosophy? (1994) and Heidegger’s course lectures in What Is Called Thinking? (2004). Both a...