Dopuszczalne ograniczenia wolności myśli, sumienia i wyznania w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka – wybrane zagadnienia

Journal Title: Radca Prawny. Zeszyty naukowe - Year 2018, Vol 16, Issue 3

Abstract

Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion is a fundamental human right and, consequently, one of the foundations of democratic society. Initially, said freedom took the form of religious tolerance, i.e. acceptance of different personal beliefs and faith. Presently, it is understood to refer to many spheres of life and has been established under international instruments on human rights protection. It is also the focus of a considerable volume of the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law. This article aims to define the subject and content of this freedom, as well as the scope of acceptable restrictions thereof in light of ECHR case-law. An analysis of the above regulations and case-law based on the formal-dogmatic approach leads to the conclusions that freedom of thought, conscience, and religion applies to all individuals irrespective of their legal status, i.e. nationality, citizenship, race, worldview, gender, age, or other criteria. The freedom has not been limited only to the individual practice of a religion, but also extends to religious activity carried out collectively. The very right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion may be considered internally and externally. The freedom to manifest a religion or beliefs may be subject to restrictions prescribed by law and necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of health or morals, or the rights and freedoms of others. The ECHR plays a crucial role in drawing the boundaries and determining the nature of such restrictions.

Authors and Affiliations

Paweł Krawczyk, Jolanta Bucińska

Keywords

Related Articles

The legal profession in Italy

The legal professions have had to adapt over the centuries and especially in the last decades to changes within the society – to recognize new laws and rights while also increasing the number of graduates who choose thes...

Zagadnienie tajemnicy zawodowej – analiza wybranych orzeczeń sądowych

The obligation to maintain professional secrecy is an indispensable element of practicing as legal adviser. Over the years, this issue has been the subject of numerous court judgments, interpretations, commentaries, and...

Zjawisko korupcji i jego zwalczanie w prawie ukraińskim

Stamping out corruption was one of the demands of Euromaidan on Maidan Nezalezhnosti in 2014. Since then, far-reaching changes have been introduced in the legal and institutional sphere. Yet the question of what has actu...

Skarga na rzecznika dyscyplinarnego, a jego wyłączenie

This article presents the issues of lodging complaints against legal advisers, excluding Disciplinary Ombudsmen and the exclusion proceedings themselves, as well as the practice adopted by the Chief Disciplinary Ombudsma...

Czy w Polsce są wolne sądy? Ocena z perspektywy trzech lat walki o praworządność

The independence of the courts and judges, together with the administrative supervision of the Executive, has long been one of the most sensitive problems in the Judiciary. In this article, the author analyses the statut...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP594534
  • DOI -
  • Views 101
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Paweł Krawczyk, Jolanta Bucińska (2018). Dopuszczalne ograniczenia wolności myśli, sumienia i wyznania w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka – wybrane zagadnienia. Radca Prawny. Zeszyty naukowe, 16(3), 29-48. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-594534