FORMAL AND SEMANTIC PRINCIPLES OF INFRINGEMENT OF NON-SEGMENTED SENTENCES STRUCTURES
Journal Title: Scientific journal «International Journal of Philology» - Year 2018, Vol 1, Issue 292
Abstract
Introduction. The structural variety of the unphraseologized and phraseologized non-segmented sentences, the presence / absence of a stable structural scheme enables the creation of a common structural typology of these sentences, taking into account the specifics of the individual types, embedded in the structural and semantic typologies. There was no holistic study of all structural and semantic types of unphraseologized and phraseologized non-segmented sentences. Therefore, the structural-semantic typology of non-segmented constructions, based on two nodal concepts – syntactic connectivity and syntactic indivisibility, is proposed. Purpose. To substantiate the formal and semantic principles of systematization of syntactically non-segmented sentences. Methods. In the process of research, the following methods were used: descriptive, modeling, component analysis, and transformational. Results. The structural typology of non-segmented, actually-unbound sentences is based on the number of structural components and their morphological nature. Phraseologized sentences include phraseologized sentences with tautological components, semi-phraseologized, and partially phraseologized sentences. Their common structural feature is the phraseologized complex, which fills the bonding constants and variable components. The structure of phraseologized sentences with tautological components must be described based on the following criteria: morphological nature of the constant component; morphological nature of the variable components; the position of the constant component. These criteria enable the allocation of structural types of phraseologized sentences. In semi-phraseologized sentences, a permanent component is an organizational center. Constant and variable, for the most part noun or infinitive component, form a phraseologized complex, which possesses semantic integrity. According to the formal principle, semi-phraseologised sentences are divided into structural types, selected according to such criteria as the number of components in the phrase-complex, the morphological expression of the constant and variable components, and the position of the constant component. In quantitative filling of the phrase-complexes in the structure of semi-phraseologized sentences there are two-, three-, four-, and five-membered. In part, in a phraseologized sentence, the phrase-compound or phrase-particle-connective complex has a clearly defined position: the phraseologized integral unity takes the preposition in the sentence, and the conjunction begins with its second part. Phraseologized unity can combine three or four components. According to the type of categorical value, non-segmented, actually-unbranched sentences are three types: 1) with the meaning of «assertion»; 2) with the meaning of «denial»; 3) with the meaning of «expression of will». Phraseologized sentences with tautological components combine two semantic types: 1) with the categorical meaning of «assertion»; 2) with the categorical value «score», and semi-phraseologized sentences - four semantic types: 1) with the categorical meaning of «assertion»; 2) with the categorical meaning of «denial»; 3) with a categorical value «estimate»; 4) with the categorical value of «will». Four semantic types of partially phraseologized sentences: 1) sentences with temporal relations, 2) sentences with generalized conditional relations, 3) sentences with explanatory relations, 4) sentences with affective relations. Conclusion. Thus, the selection of the criteria of formal and semantic character made it possible to systematize the structural and semantic types of unphraseologized and phraseologized non-segmented sentences, which also filled the two-dimensional typology of these sentences in Ukrainian linguistics.
Authors and Affiliations
M Lychuk
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP419936
- DOI -
- Views 137
- Downloads 0
SEMANTIC FIELD OF LANDSCAPE NAMES AND THE ACCOMPANIED PLANTS NAMES
Globalization has gradually become the most influential reality, which organizes the living world of a mankind in a new way. Linguistic space serves as the intellectual interior of the progressive development of any nati...
Editing features of text translation on agrarian subject.
The issues of translation and editing of scientific literature, including texts on the subject of Forestry and Landscape Architecture are analysed. The features of editing texts as sample texts on agricultural topics are...
LANGUAGE AS A KEY IDENTITY FACTOR OF UKRAINE’S NATION
Language status is a subject of hot discussions in Ukraine. In the recent years the organs of State power passed a number of legal acts and resolutions widening the limits of home language implementation. The Law on Lang...
GREEK-LATIN DOUBLET DESIGNATIONS OF PLANT PARTS IN MODERN BOTANICAL TERMINOLOGY
The article deals with live issue for terminology of Greco-Latin doublets status in the modern term systems of biological sciences, in particular – in botanic one. Due to historical causes of origin of many biological sc...
STRUCTURAL AND SEMANTIC PECULIARITIES OF ENGLISH TERMS IN THE VETERINARY SUBLANGUAGE IN THE CONTEXT OF UKRAINIAN TRANSLATION
Terminology issues as a component part of general linguistics problematics are seen through the perspective of modern linguistics, since terminological systems are changing and being replenished with new concepts in acco...