Formation and evolution of the borders of Greater Romania (1918-1940)

Journal Title: Codrul Cosminului - Year 2015, Vol 21, Issue 1

Abstract

The borders of the Greater Romania are the direct result of the First World War. Due to the war effort made on the side of the Entente, Romania has reunited the old Romanian historical provinces Bucovina and Transylvania (including Banat, Crișana, Maramureș and Satu Mare), and the counties of Durostor (Dorostolon) and Kaliakra of Southern Dobrogea. Following the outbreak of the Socialist Revolution of October 1917, and the unraveling of the Russian Empire, Romania managed to incorporate the Romanian historical province of Bessarabia, annexed by the Russian Empire in 1812. The properly evolution of the Romanian Kingdom’s borders in the years between 1918 and 1940 was influenced by the political, diplomatic and military international context. After recognizing the new borders of Romania at the Paris Peace Conference (1919-1920), the Kingdom of Romanian cultivated good political, diplomatic and military relations with Poland, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, in case of an unprovoked attack by the Soviet Union (the alliance with Poland) or by Hungary (The Little Entente, the alliance formed in 1923 together with Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia). The border with Bulgaria was defended diplomatic and, if necessary, military by the Romanian State, through the Balkan Entente, formed in 1934 with the participation of Romania, Yugoslavia, Greece and Turkey. In the interwar period, the borders of the Greater Romania were threatened by three revisionist attitudes: the Soviet revisionism (by far the most dangerous), the Hungarian revisionism and the Bulgarian revisionism. In 1940, with a highly favorable international context, generated by the policy of appeasement followed by Britain and France towards Germany, Italy and the USSR, in conjunction with the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of 23 August 1939, the Soviet Union, Hungary and Bulgaria have changed the borders of the Greater Romania. In addition, Romania has ceded Bessarabia and the Northern Bukovina to the USSR, the Northwestern Transylvania to Hungary, and the counties of Durostor (Dorostolon) and Kaliakra to Bulgaria.

Authors and Affiliations

Cezar Ciorteanu

Keywords

Related Articles

Foreign Trade Relations of the Slovak Republic (1939 – 1945) with the Countries of South-Eastern Europe 

The important role in the Slovak economy had foreign trade. Paradoxically, the difference within from the present era, when exist passive balance of trade, Slovakia at this time was in danger with unlimited outlet of its...

Problema tsivilizatsionnogo vybora v stranah tsentral'no-vostochnoi Evropy posle Pervoi Mirovoi Voiny

La question concernant l’option sur une civilisation des pays de l’Europe Centrale et d’Est après la Première Guerre Mondiale. L’auteur y analyse le premier essai des peuples de l’Europe Centrale et d’Est de choisir ent...

Post War (WWI) Central and Eastern Europe: Time of Civilizational Choice

The creation of the national states in the Central and Eastern Europe after First World War was of enormous importance to the peoples of this region. Nevertheless, despite the important issue of gaining their independenc...

 Valeurs bibliophiles dans la langue française presentes en Bucovine (XVII-eme-XVIII-eme siecles)

 Comme on le sait, la Moldavie a été la plus réceptive des trois provinces roumaines à la culture française. Dans cette province-ci, les contacts avec le mouvement d'idées européen ont été plus puissants. La lutte d...

Mythologized History and Politics in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

The purpose of this work is to show the role of mythologized history in the management of modern political processes in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. The article analyses the causes of appearance of mythologized histories i...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP89944
  • DOI -
  • Views 114
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Cezar Ciorteanu (2015). Formation and evolution of the borders of Greater Romania (1918-1940). Codrul Cosminului, 21(1), 49-62. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-89944