Gender Differences in Risk Assessment: Why do Women Take Fewer Risks than Men?

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2006, Vol 1, Issue 1

Abstract

Across many real-world domains, men engage in more risky behaviors than do women. To examine some of the beliefs and preferences that underlie this difference, 657 participants assessed their likelihood of engaging in various risky activities relating to four different domains (gambling, health, recreation, and social), and reported their perceptions of (1) probability of negative outcomes, (2) severity of potential negative outcomes, and (3) enjoyment expected from the risky activities. Women's greater perceived likelihood of negative outcomes and lesser expectation of enjoyment partially mediated their lower propensity toward risky choices in gambling, recreation, and health domains. Perceptions of severity of potential outcomes was a partial mediator in the gambling and health domains. The genders did not differ in their propensity towards taking social risks. A fifth domain of activities associated with high potential payoffs and fixed minor costs was also assessed. In contrast to other domains, women reported being more likely to engage in behaviors in this domain. This gender difference was partially mediated by women's more optimistic judgments of the probability of good outcomes and of outcomes being more intensely positive.

Authors and Affiliations

Christine R. Harris, Michael Jenkins, and Dale Glaser

Keywords

Related Articles

"If I look at the mass I will never act": Psychic numbing and genocide

Most people are caring and will exert great effort to rescue individual victims whose needy plight comes to their attention. These same good people, however, often become numbly indifferent to the plight of individuals w...

A shocking experiment: New evidence on probability weighting and common ratio violations

We study whether probability weighting is observed when individuals are presented with a series of choices between lotteries consisting of real non-monetary adverse outcomes, electric shocks. Our estimation of the parame...

Bullshit makes the art grow profounder

Across four studies participants (N = 818) rated the profoundness of abstract art images accompanied with varying categories of titles, including: pseudo-profound bullshit titles (e.g., The Deaf Echo), mundane titles (e....

Recalled emotions and risk judgments: Field study of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon War

The current study is based on a field study of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon war that was conducted in two waves, the first two weeks after the end of the war, and the second 18 months later (2008). The purpose of the study wa...

The influence of the ratio bias phenomenon on the elicitation of health states utilities

This paper tests whether logically equivalent risk formats can lead to different health state utilities elicited by means of the traditional standard gamble (SG) method and a modified version of the method that we call "...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677548
  • DOI -
  • Views 266
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Christine R. Harris, Michael Jenkins, and Dale Glaser (2006). Gender Differences in Risk Assessment: Why do Women Take Fewer Risks than Men?. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677548