How far is the suffering? The role of psychological distance and victims’ identifiability in donation decisions

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2018, Vol 13, Issue 5

Abstract

We are regularly told about people at various locations around the globe, both near and far, who are in distress or in dire need. In the present research, we examined how the prospective donor’s psychological distance from a given victim may interact with the victim’s identification to determine the donor’s willingness to accede to requests for donations to help the victim in question. In three studies, we measured willingness to donate (Studies 1 & 2) and actual donations (Study 3) to identified or unidentified victims, while measuring (Study 1) or manipulating (Studies 2 & 3) the psychological distance between prospective donors and the recipients. Results indicate that increasing the psychological distance between prospective donors and victims decreases willingness to help — but only when the victims are unidentified, not when they are identified. This suggests that victim’s identification mitigates the effect of distance on donor’s willingness to help.

Authors and Affiliations

Tehila Kogut, Ilana Ritov, Enrico Rubaltelli and Nira Liberman

Keywords

Related Articles

Myopic loss aversion: Potential causes of replication failures

This paper presents two studies on narrow bracketing and myopic loss aversion. The first study shows that the tendency to segregate multiple gambles is eliminated if subjects face a certainty equivalent or a probability...

The less-is-more effect: Predictions and tests

In inductive inference, a strong prediction is the less-is-more effect: Less information can lead to more accuracy. For the task of inferring which one of two objects has a higher value on a numerical criterion, there ex...

Moral identity in psychopathy

Several scholars have recognized the limitations of theories of moral reasoning in explaining moral behavior. They have argued that moral behavior may also be influenced by moral identity, or how central morality is to o...

Gender differences in lying in sender-receiver games: A meta-analysis

Whether there are gender differences in lying has been largely debated in the past decade. Previous studies found mixed results. To shed light on this topic, here I report a meta-analysis of 8,728 distinct observations,...

In defense of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research: Cross-cultural validation of the dual process model of moral judgment

The dual process model of moral judgment (DPM; Greene et al., 2004) argues that such judgments are influenced by both emotion-laden intuition and controlled reasoning. These influences are associated with distinct neural...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678376
  • DOI -
  • Views 158
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Tehila Kogut, Ilana Ritov, Enrico Rubaltelli and Nira Liberman (2018). How far is the suffering? The role of psychological distance and victims’ identifiability in donation decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678376