Learning psychology from riddles: The case of stumpers

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2018, Vol 13, Issue 1

Abstract

Riddles can teach us psychology when we stop to consider the psychological principles that make them “work”. This paper studies a particular class of riddles that we call stumpers, and provides analysis of the various principles (some familiar, some novel) that inhibit most people from finding the correct solution – or any solution – even though they find the answers obvious ex post. We restrict our analysis to four stumpers, propose the psychological antecedents of each, and provide experimental support for our conjectures.

Authors and Affiliations

Maya Bar-Hillel, Tom Noah and Shane Frederick

Keywords

Related Articles

A response to Mandel’s (2019) commentary on Stastny and Lehner (2018)

Stastny and Lehner (2018) compared the accuracy of forecasts in an intelligence community prediction market to comparable forecasts in analysis reports prepared by groups of professional intelligence analysts. To obtain...

A direct and comprehensive test of two postulates of politeness theory applied to uncertainty communication

Applied to uncertainty communication, politeness theory postulates that when announcing bad news (1) speakers may intend not only to inform, but also to manage (e.g., save) the hearers’ or speakers’ own faces (i.e., face...

The empirical content of theories in judgment and decision making: Shortcomings and remedies

According to Karl Popper, we can tell good theories from poor ones by assessing their empirical content (empirischer Gehalt), which basically reflects how much information they convey concerning the world. “The empirical...

Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment

We designed an experiment to test the robustness of Dana, Weber, and Kuang’s (DWK), 2007 results. DWK observed that, when participants were given a “costless” way — the click of a button — to ignore the consequences of t...

How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes

In recent years, numerous studies comparing intuition and deliberation have been published. However, relatively little is known about the cognitive processes underlying the two decision modes. In two studies, we analyzed...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678330
  • DOI -
  • Views 146
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Maya Bar-Hillel, Tom Noah and Shane Frederick (2018). Learning psychology from riddles: The case of stumpers. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678330