Legal procedure before a district court, in litigations that arise from a dispute of a bailiff’s act
Journal Title: Revista Institutului Național al Justiției - Year 2017, Vol 43, Issue 4
Abstract
Dispute of the bailiff’s act is that institution- subject of major importance and interest in the civil process. Regulation and use of means offered by this institution undoubtedly contribute in ensuring a fair trial, an effective realization of the adversarial principle, the equality principle and availability of the civil process’ principle. The local doctrine of civil process, though it does not have a solid tradition, it still holds a consistent foundation, determined by the rather rich judicial case law, which is in a continuous process of uniformity and development. Equally significant is the contribution of the legislative amendments, implemented through Law no. 191/2016, which determined a significant impact in the execution of the procedure for disputing the acts of the bailiff, advantages or disadvantages to be achieved in due time. In particular, regarding the introduction of the phrase „court order” instead of the word „judgment”, we mention that, although apparently through this amendment, the legislator wanted the correlation of the notion of „petition”, which is qualified as a request by the party, within a process, with the notion of „order”, which is an intermediate act, issued by the court, until the issuance of the judgment, determining the place of the enforcement procedure as an optional phase of the civil process, however, this change left room for the appearance of different ambiguities, which may appear at the stage of the examination in court of actions related to dispute of the bailiff’s act.
Authors and Affiliations
Gheorghe Stratulat
Confrontation clause
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution enumerates a cluster of rights granted to criminal defendants and is designed to make criminal prosecutions more accurate, fair, and legitimate. The Confrontation Cl...
The assignments of Constitutional Court of Republic of Moldova in matters of control of executive power acts
This study is dedicated to an analysis of the assignments of the Constitutional Court on issued documents by executive authorities. A central place in this study is dedicated to the Government as main component and respo...
Repair of injury caused by judicial errors and criminal damage: normal framework and practical aspects
The person who has been unjustly convicted and in respect of which there is a procedural rehabilitation act has the possibility of receiving compensation for the damage sustained. The rehabilitated person may request the...
Negligent performance of duties: delimitation of some similar criminal acts (II)
In the present study are highlighted lines between negligent performance of duties and violation by negligence of medical assistance rule and methods. In determining whether perpetrated by a doctor or another health work...
Trend of regulation of a new categories of international crimes in international public law
The present article shall attempt to illustrate crimes that in the current context have acquired international valences, namely human trafficking, the destruction of international value and piracy. We shall address the i...