Metapragmatic analysis of academic discourse

Abstract

The article focuses on the study of the academic discourse notion and results of its metapragmatic analysis. Having singled out three stages of metapragmatic analysis of any discourse type, only two of them are discussed. The first step is connected with the elaboration of a unified classification of various meta‐units in general, which the author differentiates into autonomous group of meta‐units, including contact markers, interaction‐regulating markers, reflexive markers (which are not in the focus of this research) and discourse‐organizers; and contextually‐dependant one. Then, the metapragmatic functions they perform in academic discourse are studied, with an emphasis on the specifics of their use in this discourse type. In relation to specifics of academic metadiscourse, the research results show that most typical for this discourse type are affective, evaluating, generalizing, summarizing, comparative, conditional markers, statives and verificators. Special attention is drawn to, first, accentuators, intention‐markers and guarantors, which attract addressees’ attention to speaker’s ideas, assumptions, intentions, plans, beliefs etc.; second, discourse organizers, i.e., frequency, coherent, cohesive and conclusive markers, responsible for easy flow of thoughts and speech. On the contrary, reference markers are, actually, not so characteristic of academic discourse as it was hypothesized. Despite the demands of scientific style, the latter are restricted to short references and rather vague and rare examples; citations are avoided. The use of contextually‐dependent meta‐ units is also not distinctive of academic discourse; moreover, they are realized only via modal expressions which can be viewed as being metapragmatic.

Authors and Affiliations

Я. В. Гнезділова

Keywords

Related Articles

Features of Suffixal Derivatives in French and Ukrainian cinematographic terminological system.

The article deals with the analysis of the suffixal way of termformation in French and Ukrainian cinematographic terminological system. The specificity of suffixation in the studied languages is determined. It is found o...

COMPOSITIONAL DOMINANT OF FAIRY TALE IN TERMS OF TRANSLATION OF ITS SYMBOLS

In order to perform a detailed symbolic interpretation of any text, it is essential to analyze the functional peculiari- ties of its symbols at three contextual levels, which include hypertextual, textual and hypotextual...

THE CONCEPT OF EVIL IN A. CHRISTIE’S DETECTIVE STORIES

The paper is focused on the problem of the inner structure of the detective stories by Agatha Christie. Agatha Christie is one of the most known writers of detective stories in the world. She is also one of the best-sell...

CORPORIELITY сoncept in lingocultural paradigm

Different interpretations of CORPOREALITY concept, which is verbalized in literary text has been analyzed in the article. Special attention has been paid to the formation of modern understanding of the notion of corporea...

Metaphoric Nomination of the Image of State in English-Canadian Poetry of the XVIII-XXI Centuries

The article is devoted to the problem of metaphor as the main way of imagebearing nomination of the image of state in English-Canadian poetry. Special attention is drawn to the metaphor’s classification according to morp...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP497651
  • DOI -
  • Views 107
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Я. В. Гнезділова (2018). Metapragmatic analysis of academic discourse. Львівський філологічний часопис, 3(), 64-67. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-497651