Osobowość jako ognisko dziejów. Relacja oka i pola widzenia w historiozofii Aleksandra Błoka
Journal Title: Slavia Orientalis - Year 2014, Vol 0, Issue 1
Abstract
The aim of the article is to present and analyse the dialectics of the individual consciousness and the world (or the history as the world in temporal dimension) in Alexander Blok’s thought. I suggest to conceptualize the problem in terms of Wittgensteinian interaction of the eye and the field of sight (from Tractatus logico-philosophicus 5.631), what leads to a claim, that the subject (eye) is the limit of the world (field of sight). Due to the fact, that the human perception and existence coincide with the objective reality, “world and life are one”, that is, the world as a whole is co-ordinated with the self. Solipsism coincides with pure realism, since the subject becomes the limit of the world filled with objective facts. Comparative analysis of several stages of progression of the text of the poet’s works, such as Retribution and The Iambs, serves the evidence, that for Blok, as well as for Wittgenstein, “the world is my world” or even “I am my world”. What seems to be the real world, turns to be the extension of Blok’s personal existential experience. The significance, the poet’s individuality bears upon the world, perceived from his unique, subjective moment and point of view, seems to be unpalatable. By means of perception and various existential experiences the poet’s self becomes the owner of reality and its limit. Instytut Filologii Słowiańskiej I Katedra Kulturoznawstwa Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, Fosa Staromiejska 3 , 87-100 Toruń, Poland Abstract: The aim of the article is to present and analyse the dialectics of the individual consciousness and the world (or the history as the world in temporal dimension) in Alexander Blok’s thought. I suggest to conceptualize the problem in terms of Wittgensteinian interaction of the eye and the field of sight (from Tractatus logico-philosophicus 5.631), what leads to a claim, that the subject (eye) is the limit of the world (field of sight). Due to the fact, that the human perception and existence coincide with the objective reality, “world and life are one”, that is, the world as a whole is co-ordinated with the self. Solipsism coincides with pure realism, since the subject becomes the limit of the world filled with objective facts. Comparative analysis of several stages of progression of the text of the poet’s works, such as Retribution and The Iambs, serves the evidence, that for Blok, as well as for Wittgenstein, “the world is my world” or even “I am my world”. What seems to be the real world, turns to be the extension of Blok’s personal existential experience. The significance, the poet’s individuality bears upon the world, perceived from his unique, subjective moment and point of view, seems to be unpalatable. By means of perception and various existential experiences the poet’s self becomes the owner of reality and its limit. The aim of the article is to present and analyse the dialectics of the individual consciousness and the world (or the history as the world in temporal dimension) in Alexander Blok’s thought. I suggest to conceptualize the problem in terms of Wittgensteinian interaction of the eye and the field of sight (from Tractatus logico-philosophicus 5.631), what leads to a claim, that the subject (eye) is the limit of the world (field of sight). Due to the fact, that the human perception and existence coincide with the objective reality, “world and life are one”, that is, the world as a whole is co-ordinated with the self. Solipsism coincides with pure realism, since the subject becomes the limit of the world filled with objective facts. Comparative analysis of several stages of progression of the text of the poet’s works, such as Retribution and The Iambs, serves the evidence, that for Blok, as well as for Wittgenstein, “the world is my world” or even “I am my world”. What seems to be the real world, turns to be the extension of Blok’s personal existential experience. The significance, the poet’s individuality bears upon the world, perceived from his unique, subjective moment and point of view, seems to be unpalatable. By means of perception and various existential experiences the poet’s self becomes the owner of reality and its limit
Authors and Affiliations
Małgorzata Burzyńska
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP73926
- DOI -
- Views 93
- Downloads 0
„Rzeczpospolita” jako dom wielkich bohaterów. Twórczość Juliana Ursyna Niemcewicza
This paper presents the topic of the house and home in works of Julian Ursyn Niemcewicz. Author of this article found this motif in diaries, letters and Niemcewicz’ poetry. The topic of home in polish literature after 17...
Rosja w niepublikowanym dramacie Stanisława Brzozowskiego Z dymem pożarów
Z dymem z pożarów (Up in Smoke of Blaze) The drama by Stanisław Brzozowski picks up the subject of Russian Revolution of 1905. It shows the dark side of the Russian nation that seeks revenge not freedom and that is demo...
Постмодернистские поиски истины об Иуде в Бестселлере Юрия Давыдова
This text is an attempt of interpretation of Judas' plot in Yuri Davidov's Bestseller in postmodern context what is possible because of deconstruction act of Judas' myth achieved by analysis of the intertextual connectio...
Osobowość jako ognisko dziejów. Relacja oka i pola widzenia w historiozofii Aleksandra Błoka
The aim of the article is to present and analyse the dialectics of the individual consciousness and the world (or the history as the world in temporal dimension) in Alexander Blok’s thought. I suggest to conceptualize th...
Huculskie nazwy miesięcy w zapisach terenowych Jana Janowa z lat 1936-1938 (w związku z podziałami językowymi Huculszczyzny
Hutsul Month Names in Jan Janów’s Fieldnotes from the Years 1936-1938 (In Connection with the Language Differentiation of the Hutsul Region) In the years 1936-1938 Jan Janów and his students recorded in the Hutsul region...