Overcoming practice intervention in the functioning process the judiciary
Journal Title: Часопис Київського університету права - Year 2018, Vol 1, Issue 3
Abstract
The practice of interference with the activity of the judiciary (the so-called «telephone law»), which was practiced in the former USSR, is analyzed; unfortunately, this also exists in modern Ukraine; the author argues that «telephone law» is a gross violation of the rule of law principle. The priority of party guidance, personal ties, the influence of politics and the status of the administration of fair trial is unacceptable in the judicial system of a democratic, rule-of-law state. Overcoming these unlawful practices is an important task of Ukrainian reality.
Authors and Affiliations
Dmytro Dubinko
Guarantees of advocacy: concept, genesis, meaning
The article is devoted to the complex examination of guarantees of advocacy. The analysis of legal acts, which they are established, is carried out. The essence, genesis, importance of guarantees of advocacy is considere...
The topical work on the problems of modern civil legal science (on the examples of Ukraine and Hungary)
Рецензія на кн.: Актуальні проблеми цивілістики (на прикладі України та Угорщини): збірник наукових праць за матеріалами VIII Міжнародної науково-практичної конференції (28–29 квітня 2017р.) / за заг. ред. проф. Ю. Бошиц...
Development of concession legislation of Ukraine in the context of European integration processes
The article analyzes the proposed in the draft Law of Ukraine «On Concessions» norms for improving the concession legislation in the context of the European integration and harmonization processes in Ukraine to the EU le...
Mediation in Ukraine as a social and legal institute
The article substantiates the main goals of the legislative regulation of mediation and proposes the key directions for the formation of a legal mediation institute in Ukraine.
Actual issues of establishing procedural timeframes by the prosecutor, the investigating judge and the court
The definition of procedural timeframes, as well as the establishment of procedural timeframes by the prosecutor, investigating judge, court, were formulated. Procedural procedure for establishing procedural timeframes h...