Participatory Democracy and the Disadvantaged Factors: The Taiwan and Czech Republic Cases

Abstract

Paper focuses on civic participation and its disadvantaged factors in civil society and demo¬cratic life in new democracies, especially after long-term deprivation of political freedom. I emphasize the experiences of Central and Eastern European countries or the post-communist countries, especially the Czech case, and make a comparison with Taiwan. The disadvantaged factors in this paper at least involve social indifference, corruption. powerless for the politics and no trust for governments and the general society. The factors of development in politics and the economy do not necessarily guarantee the participation in civic participation, which is regarded as a prominent component of civil society and democracy. There are still many other factors that influence the consolidation of civil society and democracy in the new democracies, and the legacy of prior regimes is one of the most decisive. Due to the degree of overall political and social control during the period of authoritarian or communist regimes, people removed themselves from politics, so their trust in politics is diminished. When confronting the bureaucratic system, people become powerless, or unwilling to concern themselves with politics. Therefore, the legacy of prior regimes, both authori¬tarian and communist, consists of political distrust, a sense of powerlessness and political indifference. During the period of democratization, corruption is also a serious problem, and corruption often brings about further political distrust and apathy toward politics. Research instruments involve international surveys including ISSP Citizenship 2004, Taiwan and Czech domestic election records and some other surveys like CWM in the Czech Republic. The examination of the Taiwan and Czech cases confirms the negative correlation between the effects of prior-regime legacy and civic participation. Those who have high levels of political distrust, sense of powerlessness, and political indifference are morę unwilling to participate in civic associations and actions to express social and political concerns, and tend to shy away from civic participation

Authors and Affiliations

Ter-Hsing Cheng

Keywords

Related Articles

Miguel de Unamuno: hombre, vida y novela

Artykuł dotyczy najbardziej istotnych aspektów filozofii Miguela de Unamuna. Ma ukazać, w jaki sposób koncepcje bytu, egzystencji oraz metody wpływają na powieść i w jaki sposób ta ostatnia może stać się punktem wyjściow...

Procesy twórcze w warsztatach kreatywności

Artykuł jest próbą odkrycia istoty treningów kreatywności. Kreatywność jest zdolnością tworzenia rzeczy nowych i wartościowych. Poddam zatem analizie te dwa przymiotniki: „nowy” i „wartościowy”. Co więcej, podejmę proble...

Economic Security as a Scientific Category: Thearetical and Methodological Aspect of Research

This article is devoted to the problems of providing economic security in the Russian Federation. Methodological approaches to research of economic security characteristics as an economic category are considered in this...

O lokalności raz jeszcze: problematyka relacji mezostrukturalnych w społeczeństwie zglobalizowanym

The issue of locality in a contemporary globalized society has been discussed by the authors. The whole argument has been divided into three significant parts. In the first one the changing character of “locality” in the...

Religijność młodzieży uczestniczącej we wspólnotach katolickich

This article is an attempt to show the impact of participation in the religious communities of youth or lack thereof on the shape of their spiritual life with particular attention to the Holiness as central issues in Chr...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP71492
  • DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/i.2013.38.2.27
  • Views 94
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ter-Hsing Cheng (2013). Participatory Democracy and the Disadvantaged Factors: The Taiwan and Czech Republic Cases. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, Sectio I Philosophia-Sociologia, 38(2), 27-62. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-71492