REVAMP OF JUDGE’S STATUS

Abstract

The reformation process of the judicial system cannot be done without defining its purpose and strategy. Therefore, the President of Ukraine established the Council on judicial reform, which has developed the Strategy for the reform of the judicial system, justice and related legal institutes for 2015–2020, for which the Action Plan was adopted on the implementation of the provisions of the Strategy. The latter, in its turn, contained a detailed list of tasks, measures, expected results and indicators for implementation of the reform of the judiciary, justice and related legal institutes. The process of formation and development of the judicial system of independent Ukraine took place at certain stages, however, none of them could be called a complete judicial reform. Of course, no reform is going on without difficulty, but the need to reform the Ukrainian judicial system continues to be one of the main tasks for the state today. The key solutions to these tasks are the legislative consolidation of new foundations of the judicial system and the status of judges, ensuring access to justice, introducing a fair judicial procedure, ensuring independence, impartiality and professionalism of judges, improving the financing of the judiciary, etc. The solution of these tasks should be carried out comprehensively by taking into account other related legal institutions – advocacy, prosecution and execution of court decisions. Diplomatic dialogue is also important, since there are different views on judicial reform, which continue to make the whole process of its implementation more complicated. In order to ensure the effective functioning and further development of the judicial system, it is necessary to have a theoretical understanding of the issues of the implementation of judicial and legal reform. Such studies are necessary for the study and further consideration of problems that arise in the process of reformation. During the years of Ukraine’s independence, there have been many attempts to make changes in the judiciary, which were of different intensity and consequences. In fact, during this time, the judicial system and the administration of justice were a constant object of reform. However, no changes have yet received the name of judicial reform, not only formally, but also in public opinion.

Authors and Affiliations

І. С. Лісна

Keywords

Related Articles

TYPES OF JUDICIAL ACTS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE OF UKRAINE

The article is sanctified to research of judicial acts that is accepted by courts in order of the civil procedure. Essence of these acts of justice is certain, basic differences are set between them depending on the circ...

CONCEPT AND STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF THE CRIMINALISTIC CHARACTERIZATION OF CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE

The article considers the differences between criminal law and criminalistics characteristics of crimes. Different points of view of scientists are analyzed and the author's own position on understanding such a category...

THE CIRCUMSTANCES RECOGNIZED BY THE COURT OF COMMON KNOWLEDGE IN CASES ARISING FROM AUTHOR’S LEGAL RELATIONS OF THE DISPUTED

The article is devoted to disclosing the essence of one of the grounds of exemption from proof of circumstances recognized by the court are well known. Directly based on the analysis of the doctrinal approaches of civi...

VIOLATION OF THE STATUTORY REGULATIONS AS THE BASIS FOR THE INVALIDATION OF AN ECONOMIC OBLIGATION CONCLUDED IN THE TEMPORARILY OCCUPIED TERRITORY OF UKRAIN

The article analyzes the normative basis of invalidity of economic contracts concluded on the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine. The study of modern Ukrainian legislation and the experience of the liberated tempo...

THE STATE AS A SUBJECT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS

The article is devoted to the analysis of scientific approaches to the legislative definition of the state as a party to the administrative process. Attention is drawn to the fact that the Code of Administrative Procedur...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP668554
  • DOI -
  • Views 43
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

І. С. Лісна (2018). REVAMP OF JUDGE’S STATUS. Судова та слідча практика в Україні, 7(), 5-9. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-668554